Socks in the Dryer: Benjamin Franklin's Positive-Negative Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of static electricity in laundry, particularly focusing on the interaction between different materials like wool, polypropylene, and cotton socks. It references Benjamin Franklin's classification of wool as positively charged and polypropylene as negatively charged, suggesting that the combination of these materials in the dryer leads to static cling. The conversation humorously touches on the mystery of missing socks, proposing a whimsical theory about a black hole in dryers that causes socks to disappear. Additionally, there is mention of static reactivity charts that rank materials by their tendency to generate static electricity, with cotton being noted for its neutral properties. The discussion also briefly explores the implications of static charge on human skin and the potential health aspects related to static electricity. Overall, the thread combines scientific insights with lighthearted commentary on a common household issue.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,447
Reaction score
2,837
In the dryer were one pair wool socks, one pair black polypropylene, and a dozen or so cotton socks. Each white wool sock was stuck to one black polypro sock. Each pair was folded onto one another in a sort of coil.

Benjamin Franklin defined wool as positive, so polypro is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
Physics news on Phys.org
Hornbein said:
Benjamin Franklin defined wool as positive, so polypro is negative.
I've seen a chart of sorts for levels of "static reactivity" or whatever its called but the further apart on the list the more static "power" they have. I think it has like glass, leather, wool, etc.
 
I am fairly certain that a black hole exists in everyone's dryer that occasionally sucks up just ONE sock and dumps it out onto some random highway somewhere along the west coast of the USA. I've seen so many single socks along so many highways just laying there all lost and forlorn. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon, Borek and Sophia
I'm sure it has been called before now' non-conservation of parity'.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon and zoobyshoe
jerromyjon said:
I've seen a chart of sorts for levels of "static reactivity" or whatever its called but the further apart on the list the more static "power" they have. I think it has like glass, leather, wool, etc.

Looking up static reactivity there was something about neutron scattering. Maybe the cotton socks acted as a moderator.

Another list seemed to say that human skin had more tendency to become positively charged than anything else except air. Maybe there really is something to the health aspect of it. Neutral materials like cotton are quite rare. The most negative is silicon rubber.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
Hornbein said:
... The most negative is silicon rubber.
No, it's ebonite that is found most negatively charged in an triboeletric effect. Silicon rubber is only ranked second from the bottom.:biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
Hornbein said:
Maybe the cotton socks acted as a moderator.
Or a catalyst, like a spin-foam twist inducer..
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
Back
Top