Solid bounded by different region

In summary: Pls refer to the latest diagram i uploaded hereHere's what i did :##x^2+y^2 = 4x####x^2-4x+y^2 = 0####(x-2)^2 -4 +y^2 =0####x^2-4x+4-4+y^2 =0####x^2+y^2=4x##So , the circular part of the cylinder is located at x =2 .
  • #1
chetzread
801
1

Homework Statement


By using cylindrical coordinates , evaluate the volume of solid bounded on top of sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 and it's sides by (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x . [/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have sketched out the diagram , but i dun know which part is the solid formed... Can someone highlight the solid formed ? [/B]
 

Attachments

  • 9899.jpg
    9899.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 397
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
chetzread said:

Homework Statement


By using cylindrical coordinates , evaluate the volume of solid bounded on top of sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 and it's sides by (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x . [/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have sketched out the diagram , but i dun know which part is the solid formed... Can someone highlight the solid formed ? [/B]

Is the wording you wrote the exact statement of the problem? If so, it is confusing, and in English may easily be misinterpreted. There is a difference in meaning between saying "bounded on top of sphere... "; the "on top" says to me that the region lies above the sphere---it is on top of the sphere. However, maybe it means "bounded on top BY the sphere..." which means the region lies below the sphere: the sphere is the top of the region. I suspect that the second interpretation is intended, but the wording of the problem could be taken to imply the opposite.

Anyway, what about a lower limit? is the opposite side of the sphere also the bottom of the region? If we don't specify a bottom, we can have ##z## extending to ##-\infty##, giving an infinite volume.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #3
Ray Vickson said:
Is the wording you wrote the exact statement of the problem? If so, it is confusing, and in English may easily be misinterpreted. There is a difference in meaning between saying "bounded on top of sphere... "; the "on top" says to me that the region lies above the sphere---it is on top of the sphere. However, maybe it means "bounded on top BY the sphere..." which means the region lies below the sphere: the sphere is the top of the region. I suspect that the second interpretation is intended, but the wording of the problem could be taken to imply the opposite.

Anyway, what about a lower limit? is the opposite side of the sphere also the bottom of the region? If we don't specify a bottom, we can have ##z## extending to ##-\infty##, giving an infinite volume.
sorry , i made a typo . The original question is evaluate the volume of solid bounded on top by the sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9...
Here's after correction , the cylinder span from z = -3 to 3 ...
What is the portion of the solid bounded on top of sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 and it's sides by (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x ?
I couldn't imagine
 

Attachments

  • 408.jpg
    408.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 413
  • #4
Anyone can response ?
 
  • #5
or there's something wrong with my diagram ?
 
  • #6
chetzread said:
or there's something wrong with my diagram ?
Neither of your diagrams is very helpful, and both are incorrect. You have the circular cylinder located in the wrong place in both diagrams, and your drawing of the sphere just looks like a circle. Here's a quick sketch I did that attempts to show the portion of a sphere in the first octant.
sphere.png
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #7
@chetzread: In the ##xy## plane, draw the two circles ##x^2+y^2 = 9## (which is where the sphere cuts the ##xy## plane) and ##x^2+y^2 = 4x## (after you get it right). That picture should help you figure out the ##xy## region that your cylindrical coordinate ##r,\theta## region needs to describe. Hopefully you will see that you need two different integrals to set it up.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #8
Mark44 said:
Neither of your diagrams is very helpful, and both are incorrect. You have the circular cylinder located in the wrong place in both diagrams, and your drawing of the sphere just looks like a circle. Here's a quick sketch I did that attempts to show the portion of a sphere in the first octant.
View attachment 108124
@Mark44 , @LCKurtz , is my cylinder located at the wrong position ?

So , i have chnaged the location ... Pls refer to the latest diagram i uploaded here

Here's what i did :

##x^2+y^2 = 4x##

##x^2-4x+y^2 = 0##

##(x-2)^2 -4 +y^2 =0##

##x^2-4x+4-4+y^2 =0##

##x^2+y^2=4x##

So , the circular part of cylinder located at x =2 , right ?
 

Attachments

  • 413.jpg
    413.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 378
Last edited:
  • #9
LCKurtz said:
@chetzread: In the ##xy## plane, draw the two circles ##x^2+y^2 = 9## (which is where the sphere cuts the ##xy## plane) and ##x^2+y^2 = 4x## (after you get it right). That picture should help you figure out the ##xy## region that your cylindrical coordinate ##r,\theta## region needs to describe. Hopefully you will see that you need two different integrals to set it up.
 
  • #10
chetzread said:
@Mark44 , @LCKurtz , is my cylinder located at the wrong position ?

So , i have chnaged the location ... Pls refer to the latest diagram i uploaded here

Here's what i did :

##x^2+y^2 = 4x##

##x^2-4x+y^2 = 0##

##(x-2)^2 -4 +y^2 =0##

##x^2-4x+4-4+y^2 =0##

##x^2+y^2=4x##

So , the circular part of cylinder located at x =2 , right ?
The central axis of the cylinder goes through (2, 0, 0), yes, and is vertical. Your diagram is close to correct, except the sphere is slightly too large.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #11
Mark44 said:
The central axis of the cylinder goes through (2, 0, 0), yes, and is vertical. Your diagram is close to correct, except the sphere is slightly too large.
Ok, my problem now is which is the region that the solid formed? Can you sketch the part that the solid form using my diagram? I have problem visualizing it...
 
  • #12
chetzread said:
Ok, my problem now is which is the region that the solid formed? Can you sketch the part that the solid form using my diagram? I have problem visualizing it...
Draw a 2-D sketch of the projections of the two objects in the x-y plane.
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
Draw a 2-D sketch of the projections of the two objects in the x-y plane.
do you mean the green part is the solid formed ?
 

Attachments

  • 413.jpg
    413.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 366
  • #14
That's not what I had in mind. It's not a two-dim. sketch. Also, the solid is bounded on top by the sphere. As I read the problem description, the solid is inside the sphere, not outside it, as you show in your sketch.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #15
LCKurtz said:
@chetzread: In the ##xy## plane, draw the two circles ##x^2+y^2 = 9## (which is where the sphere cuts the ##xy## plane) and ##x^2+y^2 = 4x## (after you get it right). That picture should help you figure out the ##xy## region that your cylindrical coordinate ##r,\theta## region needs to describe. Hopefully you will see that you need two different integrals to set it up.

Mark44 said:
Draw a 2-D sketch of the projections of the two objects in the x-y plane.

We have both suggested this. You need to do it to make progress on this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #16
LCKurtz said:
We have both suggested this. You need to do it to make progress on this problem.
here it is ...
 

Attachments

  • 416.jpg
    416.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 374
  • #17
About time to hit the sack here. Where is the origin ##x=0## and ##x=1## on your sketch? Get it correct, then we can continue tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #18
LCKurtz said:
About time to hit the sack here. Where is the origin ##x=0## and ##x=1## on your sketch? Get it correct, then we can continue tomorrow.
here it is x = 0 ...
 

Attachments

  • 416.jpg
    416.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 352
  • #19
Now, how about another two-dim. sketch, this time looking at the x-z plane?
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #20
Mark44 said:
Now, how about another two-dim. sketch, this time looking at the x-z plane?
here
 

Attachments

  • 417.jpg
    417.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 342
  • #21
chetzread said:
The original question is evaluate the volume of solid bounded on top by the sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9...
Here's after correction , the cylinder span from z = -3 to 3 ...
OK, now do you have an idea of what the solid looks like? One thing that's not clear to me from your description (copied above), is the solid also bounded on the bottom by the sphere, or is it just bounded on the top by the sphere?
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #22
Mark44 said:
OK, now do you have an idea of what the solid looks like? One thing that's not clear to me from your description (copied above), is the solid also bounded on the bottom by the sphere, or is it just bounded on the top by the sphere?
Here's the original question
By using cylindrical coordinates , evaluate the volume of solid bounded on top by the sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 and it's sides by (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x .

so , i just sketched out the whole sphere ( include the portion on negative z axis)...No , i am still not sure how the solid looks like ...

Is it the diagram i posted in post #13 , the green part ?
 
  • #23
Mark44 said:
OK, now do you have an idea of what the solid looks like? One thing that's not clear to me from your description (copied above), is the solid also bounded on the bottom by the sphere, or is it just bounded on the top by the sphere?
bump
 
  • #24
chetzread said:
Here's the original question
By using cylindrical coordinates , evaluate the volume of solid bounded on top by the sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 and it's sides by (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x .

so , i just sketched out the whole sphere ( include the portion on negative z axis)...No , i am still not sure how the solid looks like ...

Is it the diagram i posted in post #13 , the green part ?
No, the sketch in post #13 (green part) isn't right.

Also, you didn't answer my last question.
is the solid also bounded on the bottom by the sphere, or is it just bounded on the top by the sphere?
 
  • #25
In order to facilitate getting this thread finished I am including a picture:
picture.jpg

This is looking almost straight down the z axis. You can see that the portion of the sphere inside the cylinder lies above the region which I will call ##D## which is the intersection of the two circles in the xy plane. So if you want the volume under the sphere and above the xy plane you have to set up the integral for the volume under the sphere over the region ##D## in polar coordinates. If you want to include the volume under the xy plane you would double that. That is what this problem is really about -- setting up that integral properly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #26
LCKurtz said:
In order to facilitate getting this thread finished I am including a picture:
View attachment 108270
This is looking almost straight down the z axis. You can see that the portion of the sphere inside the cylinder lies above the region which I will call ##D## which is the intersection of the two circles in the xy plane. So if you want the volume under the sphere and above the xy plane you have to set up the integral for the volume under the sphere over the region ##D## in polar coordinates. If you want to include the volume under the xy plane you would double that. That is what this problem is really about -- setting up that integral properly.
sorry , i really have problem understanding your diagram , can you explain further ? do you mean it's the view looking down from z a-xis ? if so , then i still can't understand it
 
  • #27
LCKurtz said:
In order to facilitate getting this thread finished I am including a picture:
View attachment 108270
This is looking almost straight down the z axis. You can see that the portion of the sphere inside the cylinder lies above the region which I will call ##D## which is the intersection of the two circles in the xy plane. So if you want the volume under the sphere and above the xy plane you have to set up the integral for the volume under the sphere over the region ##D## in polar coordinates. If you want to include the volume under the xy plane you would double that. That is what this problem is really about -- setting up that integral properly.
do you mean green part = sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 ?
yellow part = (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x ??

But , why isn't the (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x closed ? it's a cylinder , right ?
 
  • #28
LCKurtz said:
In order to facilitate getting this thread finished I am including a picture:
View attachment 108270
This is looking almost straight down the z axis. You can see that the portion of the sphere inside the cylinder lies above the region which I will call ##D## which is the intersection of the two circles in the xy plane. So if you want the volume under the sphere and above the xy plane you have to set up the integral for the volume under the sphere over the region ##D## in polar coordinates. If you want to include the volume under the xy plane you would double that. That is what this problem is really about -- setting up that integral properly.
OK , but how do the solid formed look like ? I have problem of visualizing it . . . . . Can you sketch a separate diagram for the solid formed ?
 
  • #29
chetzread said:
do you mean green part = sphere (x^2) + (y^2) + (z^2) = 9 ?
yellow part = (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x ??
Yes, the green part is the upper half of the sphere,
chetzread said:
But , why isn't the (x^2) + (y^2) = 4x closed ? it's a cylinder , right ?
It's a circular cylinder - the view, as LCKurtz said, is almost straight down the z-axis. The upper and lower ends of the cylinder are open, so I'm not sure what you're saying.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #30
Mark44 said:
Yes, the green part is the upper half of the sphere,
It's a circular cylinder - the view, as LCKurtz said, is almost straight down the z-axis. The upper and lower ends of the cylinder are open, so I'm not sure what you're saying.
Then the Object Formed Is A plane Instead Of solid? ? I Cant ImagIne Tge Solid Fomed
 
  • #31
I think you need some face-to-face time with your teacher. I gather that English isn't your first language, but still, you don't seem to be understanding anything we are trying to tell you.
 
  • #32
LCKurtz said:
I think you need some face-to-face time with your teacher. I gather that English isn't your first language, but still, you don't seem to be understanding anything we are trying to tell you.
I agree completely. We are more than 30 posts into this problem, and you still don't understand what the solid looks like, despite multiple graphs and explanations from LCKurtz and me.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #33
LCKurtz said:
I think you need some face-to-face time with your teacher. I gather that English isn't your first language, but still, you don't seem to be understanding anything we are trying to tell you.
sorry , after looking it carefully ,the solid formed is the red part ? (refer to the attachment)
So , the red part represent the projection to xy plane ?
 

Attachments

  • 424.PNG
    424.PNG
    19.1 KB · Views: 369
  • #34
here's my latest working . I use xy plane projection
 

Attachments

  • 425.PNG
    425.PNG
    9.5 KB · Views: 372
  • 426.png
    426.png
    41.5 KB · Views: 378
  • #35
You have errors in your work. But you are supposed to do it in cylindrical coordinates anyway. You need ##dz,~dr,~d\theta## variables in your integrals.
 

FAQ: Solid bounded by different region

1. What is a solid bounded by different regions?

A solid bounded by different regions refers to a three-dimensional object that has distinct boundaries or surfaces that separate it from its surrounding space. These boundaries can be defined by different regions or shapes, such as cubes, spheres, or cylinders.

2. How is a solid bounded by different regions different from a regular solid?

A solid bounded by different regions is different from a regular solid because it has multiple boundaries or surfaces that define its shape. Regular solids, such as cubes or spheres, have uniform boundaries and do not have distinct regions.

3. What are some examples of solids bounded by different regions?

Some examples of solids bounded by different regions include a rectangular prism, a cone, a pyramid, and a torus. These objects have distinct boundaries that define their unique shapes and volumes.

4. How are solids bounded by different regions used in science?

Solids bounded by different regions are used in science for various purposes, such as modeling and understanding the behavior of materials, studying the properties of different shapes and volumes, and creating three-dimensional representations of objects and structures.

5. What are the applications of studying solids bounded by different regions?

The study of solids bounded by different regions has many practical applications in fields such as engineering, architecture, and physics. It can help in designing structures and objects with specific shapes and volumes, understanding the behavior of materials under different conditions, and creating accurate models for scientific experiments and simulations.

Back
Top