MHB Solve Box Cost Minimization w/ Lagrange Multipliers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Lagrange multiplier method to minimize the total cost of manufacturing an open-top box with a volume of 6 ft³. The cost function is defined as C(x,y,z) = 3xz + yz + 2xy, with constraints based on the box's volume. Through the application of Lagrange multipliers, the dimensions that minimize cost are found to be x = 1 ft, y = 3 ft, and z = 2 ft. The minimum cost calculated for these dimensions is $18. The solution demonstrates the effectiveness of the Lagrange multiplier method in optimizing manufacturing costs.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Please help!? lagrange multiplier method?


Find the dimensions of the box which will minimize the TOTAL COST of manufacturing the following open top box of volume 6ft^3?

Solve by the lagrange multiplier method!
Bottom panel costs $3/ft^2
side panel cost $.50/ft^2
Front and back panels cost $1/ft^2

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello acacia,

I would orient the box such that the width is $x$, the height is $y$ and the length is $z$. Hence, the bottom panel has area $xz$, the side panels have a total area of $2yz$ and the front and back panels have a combined area of $2xy$.

Let all linear measures be given in feet.

Thus, our objective function, the function we wish to minimize is the cost function in dollars, which is given by:

$$C(x,y,z)=3xz+yz+2xy$$

Subject to the constraint on the volume:

$$g(x,y,z)=xyz-6=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain:

$$3z+2y=\lambda(yz)$$

$$z+2x=\lambda(xz)$$

$$3x+y=\lambda(xy)$$

Solving for $\lambda$, the first two equations imply:

$$\frac{2y+3z}{yz}=\frac{2x+z}{xz}$$

Cross-multiplying, we obtain:

$$2xyz+3xz^2=2xyz+yz^2$$

$$3xz^2=yz^2$$

Since the constraint requires $$0<z$$, we may write:

$$3x=y$$

In like manner the first and third equations above imply:

$$\frac{2y+3z}{yz}=\frac{3x+y}{xy}$$

Cross-multiplying, we obtain:

$$2xy^2+3xyz=3xyz+y^2z$$

$$2x=z$$

Substituting for $y$ and $z$ into the constraint, we obtain:

$$x(3x)(2x)=6$$

$$x^3=1$$

$$x=1\implies y=3,\,z=2$$

Observing that:

$$C(1,3,2)=3(1)(2)+(3)(2)+2(1)(3)=18$$

and another constraint value such as $(x,y,z)=(1,2,3)$ yields:

$$C(1,2,3)=3(1)(3)+(2)(3)+2(1)(2)=19$$

We may then conclude:

$$C_{\min}=C(1,3,2)=18$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top