Solve Elastic Scattering: T, Zr & E(initial)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around solving a problem related to elastic scattering involving neutrons and zirconium (Zr). The key equation presented calculates the transferred energy (T) from a neutron to a target based on the initial energy and scattering angle. A participant expresses confusion about the absence of the initial energy of the incident neutron, which is crucial for solving the problem. The conversation suggests that the minimum energy required for the neutron to displace two Zr atoms needs to be determined, and one participant proposes a method to relate total incident energy, transferred energy, and the neutron's energy post-scattering. The discussion highlights the importance of finding the initial energy to proceed with the calculations effectively.
matt222
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement





Homework Equations



T=2*(m*M/(m+M)^2)*E(initial)*(1-cos(angle)), T is transferred energy from the neutron to the target.

displacement energy for Zr=40eV

The Attempt at a Solution



the question is strange for me it seems to me there is a trick since we don't have the initial energy of the incident particle!

I can't start solving without knowing the energy of the incident particle! any help please!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to solve that equation for? You are given everything except the initial energy. Solve for that and use it to find the initial speed of the neutron.
 
Yes this is the trick now!
we need to find the minimum energy (in eV) of the neutron to displace two Zr in a row
what i can do is as follow:

total incident neutron energy is equal E, transferred energy to the target is T, neutron energy after scattering is Q, so that totat energy is :

E=T+Q

BUT here i lost what do you think about my idea
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top