MHB Solve for Rational Term: 2x^2-1 Over x^2+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter theakdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational Term
AI Thread Summary
The expression $$\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1}$$ simplifies to $$2-\frac{3}{x^2+1}$$ through polynomial long division. By dividing the numerator by the denominator, the quotient is 2, and the remainder is -3, leading to the final expression. This method is similar to dividing numbers, where the remainder is factored into the result. Alternative approaches yield the same conclusion, confirming the validity of the simplification. Understanding this process enhances problem-solving skills for similar algebraic expressions.
theakdad
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I have a question why is $$\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1}$$ equal to $$2-\frac{3}{x^2+1}$$ ??
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
wishmaster said:
U have a question why is $$\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1}$$ equal to $$2-\frac{3}{x^2+1}$$ ??
\begin{aligned}
\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1}
&= \frac{2x^2 + 2 - 3}{x^2+1} \\
&= \frac{2(x^2 + 1) - 3}{x^2+1} \\
&= \frac{2(x^2 + 1)}{x^2+1} - \frac 3{x^2+1}\\
&= 2-\frac{3}{x^2+1} \\
\end{aligned}
 
I like Serena said:
\begin{aligned}
\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1}
&= \frac{2x^2 + 2 - 3}{x^2+1} \\
&= \frac{2(x^2 + 1) - 3}{x^2+1} \\
&= \frac{2(x^2 + 1)}{x^2+1} - \frac 3{x^2+1}\\
&= 2-\frac{3}{x^2+1} \\
\end{aligned}

thank you!

Is this the only way to caclulate it?
 
wishmaster said:
thank you!

Is this the only way to caclulate it?

It is similar to calculating:
\begin{aligned}
\frac 7 2
&= \frac {3\cdot 2 + 1}{2} \\
&= \frac {3\cdot 2} 2 + \frac{1}{2} \\
&= 3 + \frac 1 2
\end{aligned}
Just with more complicated expressions.Alternatively, you can say that if you divide $7$ by $2$, you get $3$ with a remainder of $7 - 3 \cdot 2 = 1$.
That is, $$\frac 7 2 = 3 + \frac 1 2$$.Similarly, you can say that if you divide $2x^2-1$ by $x^2 +1$, you get $2$, because the coefficient of $x^2$ is $2$.

The remainder is then $(2x^2 - 1) - 2(x^2+1) = 2x^2 - 1 - 2x^2 - 2 = -3$.
So
$$\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1} = 2 + \frac {-3}{x^2+1}$$

Note that this "other" method is really the same thing.
 
Hello, wishmaster!

\text{Why is }\,\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1}\,\text{ equal to }\,2-\frac{3}{x^2+1}\,?
Are you familiar with Long Division?

. . \begin{array}{cccccc}<br /> &amp;&amp;&amp;&amp; 2 \\<br /> &amp;&amp; --&amp;--&amp;-- \\<br /> x^2+1 &amp; | &amp; 2x^2 &amp;-&amp;1 \\<br /> &amp;&amp; 2x^2 &amp;+&amp; 2 \\<br /> &amp;&amp; --&amp;--&amp;-- \\<br /> &amp;&amp;&amp; - &amp; 3 \end{array}Therefore: .\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1} \;\;=\;\;2 - \frac{3}{x^2+1}
 
soroban said:
Hello, wishmaster!


Are you familiar with Long Division?

. . \begin{array}{cccccc}<br /> &amp;&amp;&amp;&amp; 2 \\<br /> &amp;&amp; --&amp;--&amp;-- \\<br /> x^2+1 &amp; | &amp; 2x^2 &amp;-&amp;1 \\<br /> &amp;&amp; 2x^2 &amp;+&amp; 2 \\<br /> &amp;&amp; --&amp;--&amp;-- \\<br /> &amp;&amp;&amp; - &amp; 3 \end{array}Therefore: .\frac{2x^2-1}{x^2+1} \;\;=\;\;2 - \frac{3}{x^2+1}
Thank you all for the help! I have studied those kind of problems,so now i know how to do it!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top