MHB Solve for the angles in a triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazparkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the angles in an isosceles triangle. The user initially calculated x as 30 and y as 60, assuming the triangle's base angles were equal. After further calculations, they revised their values to x = 40 and y = 80, which was confirmed as correct by another participant. The equation used was 60 + x + 2x = 180, leading to the correct angle measures. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying calculations in geometry.
gazparkin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Could someone check that I'm right with this one, or put me right! I've worked the value out as

x=30 and y (2x) = 60. I've come to this as I think it's an isosceles triangle so the base angles would be equal. Am I right?

Thank you!

View attachment 9147
 

Attachments

  • Traingle 2.jpg
    Traingle 2.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 116
Mathematics news on Phys.org
60 + x + y = 180

if y = 2x ...

60 + x + 2x = 180

try again ...
 
Is it x = 40 and y =80??
 
gazparkin said:
Is it x = 40 and y =80??

Yes, that's correct.
 
catmitt98 said:
Yes, that's correct.

Thank you for your help.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top