I Solve General Relativity Equation: Steps & Tips

The black vegetable
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Maybe I'm just being stupid, missing something simple ? How do you get from the top two equations to the second equation? Many thanks
upload_2018-12-9_21-4-50.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-9_21-4-50.png
    upload_2018-12-9_21-4-50.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 1,469
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a weak field approximation. What could "weak field" mean here?
 
You could use the binomial expansion.

##(1+ \frac{\phi_a}{c^2})^{-1} \approx (1 - \frac{\phi_a}{c^2})##

The quoted result is to first order in ##1/c^2##.
 
ah that's great thank you, I will look into binomial expansion, never met it before :)
 
You're doing general relativity, but have never seen the binomial expansion before? Be cautious about other mathematical knowledge lacking then, I'd say. Good luck anyway ;)
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top