Solve Geodesic Problem: Show ku^β = u^α∇αu^β

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a geodesic problem from Wald's General Relativity book, specifically showing that a curve with a tangent satisfying u^α ∇_α u^β = k u^β can be reparameterized to meet the condition ∼u^α ∇_α ∼u^β = 0. The user attempts to reparameterize the curve from u = d/dλ to ∼u = d/dt, leading to the expression u^α = (dt/dλ)∼u^α. They express the covariant derivative of u^β using the product rule but express confusion about handling the term ∇_α (dt/dλ). The user seeks clarification on the mathematical implications of this term and how to proceed with the derivation, questioning whether their approach is correct. The discussion highlights the complexities of reparameterization in the context of geodesic equations in General Relativity.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working my way through Wald's GR book and doing this geodesic problem:

Show that any curve whose tangent satisfies u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = k u^\beta, where k is a constant, can be reparameterized so that \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta = 0.

Homework Equations



Geodesic equation

The Attempt at a Solution



If we assume that the curve was originally parameterized so that u = d/d\lambda and we reparameterize so that \tilde{u} = d/dt with t = t(\lambda) then it follows immediately that u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha.

So then u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right). Now I know I need to expand this out into two terms, and I was thinking I could use the product rule to do that, but I'm a bit confused about how to do that. It seems I'd get
u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right) = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta + u^\alpha \tilde{u^\beta} \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda}
The first term I can relate to my definition u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha to get \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\right)^2 \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta, and I know I'm supposed to relate this and the other term to the other side of the geodesic equation (with the constant k) to get a differential equation to solve for t(lambda). But I'm confused about how to get there from here, mostly from term \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda}. I don't understand what it means mathematically (isn't dt/dlambda a scalar?), let alone how to do anything with it. Can anyone explain how to take the next step? Or was my "product rule" guess total nonsense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transform all vectors and remember that the covariant derivative becomes a partial derivative for scalars
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top