MHB Solve Investment Problem: Net Profit $1,850 from $13,500 Bonus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kos46
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Net
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an investment problem where Jerome invested part of his $13,500 bonus in a fund with an 8% profit and the rest in stock that lost 4%, resulting in a net profit of $1,850. The initial attempts to solve the equations led to incorrect values, indicating a flaw in the problem itself. Participants suggest that if the problem's parameters are accurate, it may lack clarity regarding the investment duration, as the net profit calculations do not align with the given figures. One user demonstrated that a correct solution could be achieved by assuming a specific investment duration, revealing the importance of time in profit calculations. The conversation highlights the necessity of precise problem statements in investment scenarios.
Kos46
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Could someone please help me with the problem I've typed below? It is very similar to another problem on this forum <http://mathhelpboards.com/pre-algebra-algebra-2/investment-problem-8808.html>. I've tried to solve it in a similar way (exclusion and/or substitution) but I keep getting the values \$19 916.67 (fund) and -\$6416.67 (stock) for my answer, which obviously can't be right. I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how to solve this the right way.

Here is my problem:
Jerome invested part of his \$13,500 bonus in a fund that paid an 8% profit and
invested the rest in stock that lost 4%. What was his investment in the fund if
his overall net profit was \$1,850?

Thank you for any help at all!
Judith
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let $F$ be the amount invested in the fund and $S$ be the amount invested in the stock. So, right away we know:

$$F+S=13500\tag{1}$$
And then the information regarding the profit may be written as:

$$0.08F-0.04S=1850\tag{2}$$
So, since we're asked to find $F$, solve (1) for $S$, substitute this into (2), and then solve for $F$. :)
 
MarkFL said:
I would let $F$ be the amount invested in the fund and $S$ be the amount invested in the stock. So, right away we know:

$$F+S=13500\tag{1}$$
And then the information regarding the profit may be written as:

$$0.08F-0.04S=1850\tag{2}$$
So, since we're asked to find $F$, solve (1) for $S$, substitute this into (2), and then solve for $F$. :)

Wow! Thank you for replying so quickly!
OK, so, I have
Let x = the amount of money that made an 8% profit
Let y = the amount of money that lost 4%

[1] x + y = 13 500
x = 13 500 - y
y = 13 500 -x

[2] 8/100x - 4/100y = 1850
Multiply both sides by 100 to get rid of fractions
8x - 4y = 185000
8x - 4(13500 - x) = 185000
8x - 54000 + 4x = 185000
12x = 239000
x = 19916.67
Therefore, y = -6416.67 ?

Or by elimination
[1] x + y = 13500
[2] 8x - 4y = 185000

So, multiply [1] by 4 so that y cancels out:

[1] 4x + 4y = 54000
[2] 8x - 4y = 185000
12x = 239000
x = 19916.67

:( If you have time, could you please tell me what I'm doing wrong here?
 
I think the issue here is not with your work, but with the problem instead. If Jerome had invested his entire bonus in the stock, his net profit would be less than \$1850, it would only be \$1080. This is why you're getting answers that don't make sense. :)
 
Thank you so much for confirming my suspicions that the question was flawed! I can't tell you how many times I've tried to solve it. :)
 
If the givens in the problem are correct, then the problem
should state the period of time over which this resulted;
it is certainly not 1 year, as Mark clearly shows.

I fiddled around with this mystery.
Assuming 9000 @ 8%, thus 4500 @ -4%,
then 1850 would be correct IF time = ~3.426 years.

9000(.08)(3.426) = 2466.72
4500(-.04)(3.426)=-616.68
for net of 1850.04

Amen.

Howz things in St-Augustine Mark?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top