Solve Newton's Second Law: Find Angle of Elevation w/ 1.86cm Blocks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to Newton's Second Law, specifically finding the angle of elevation for a 1.00-m long track with a combined block thickness of 1.86 cm. The original poster expresses confusion about the problem's requirements, particularly the meaning of "thickness" and its relevance to the angle calculation. They suggest that the right end of the track is elevated by 1.86 cm, creating an incline, and consider using trigonometry to find the angle. Other participants question whether the problem is fully stated and emphasize the need for clarity on how Newton's laws apply. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of interpreting the problem and the importance of understanding the relationship between the given parameters.
oceanflavored
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two calibrated elevation blocks have a combined thickness of 1.86 cm. Find the angle of elevation of the 1.00-m long track for this situation.


Homework Equations


F = ma?

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having a LOT of trouble, even beginning to draw the picture for this problem. I think if someone could help me draw the picture, I would be good to go :)
Aaaaand, I'm not exactly sure what the 'thickness' refers to? The weight?

I know that I haven't really provided a good enough attempt at a solution :/ But it's because I am honestly really lost as to where I even begin. Any help at all would be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without a diagram, I'm just guessing that the right end of the track is elevated 1.86 cm above the left end, creating an incline sloping upward at a small angle. Use trig to find the angle, I guess. Is there another part to this problem that requires you to use Newton's law?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Is there another part to this problem that requires you to use Newton's law?

Yes, what does Newton's second law have to do with this? :confused:

Have you missed out part of the question? … it doesn't seem to make sense on it own. :redface:
 
Hmmm...
Well, this is one of our pre-labs question. And the lab is titled: Newton's Second Law of Motion. So I figured it had something to do with Newton's Laws?
Also, why do they include the thickness of the blocks, if it's just a simple trig question? :confused:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top