SOLVED: Equipotential surfaces for finite line of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential due to a uniformly charged rod extending along the z-axis. The potential at point P_1 on the z-axis and point P_2 on the x-axis is derived through integration, revealing that both points lie on an ellipse with the rod's ends as foci. The conjecture that the entire ellipse is an equipotential surface is tested by evaluating the potential at another point on the ellipse, confirming the hypothesis. The potential is shown to depend only on a parameter 'a', leading to the conclusion that equipotential surfaces in this system are confocal prolate spheroids. The problem illustrates the relationship between charge distribution and equipotential surfaces in electrostatics.
homer
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Purcell 2.10 [/B][not the problem I'm asking about, but needed for Purcell 2.11 which I am asking about]
A thin rod extends along the z axis from z = -d to z = d. The rod carries a charge uniformly distributed along its length with linear charge density \lambda. By integrating over this charge distribution calculate the potential at a point P_1 on the z axis with coordinates 0,0,2d. By another integration find the potential at a point P_2 on the x axis and locate this point to make the potential equal to the potential at P_1

Purcell 2.11 [the problem I'm asking about]
The points P_1 and P_2 in the preceding problem happen to lie on an ellipse which has the ends of the rod as its foci, as you can readily verify by comparing the sums of the distances from P_1 and from P_2 to the ends of the rod. This suggests that the whole ellipse might be an equipotential. Test that conjectire by calculating the potential at the point (3d/2, 0, d) which lies on the same ellipse. Indeed it is true, though there is no obvious reason why it should be, that the equipotential surfaces of this system are a family of confocal prolate spheroids. See if you can prove that. You will have to derive a formula for the potential at a general point (x,0,z) in the xz plane. Then show that, if x and z are related by the equation
<br /> \frac{x^2}{a^2 - d^2} + \frac{z^2}{a^2} = 1,<br />
which is the equation for an ellipse with foci at z = \pm d, the potential will depend only on the parameter a, not on x or z.

Homework Equations


Setting our zero of potential at infinity, the potential of a point charge q at a point a distance r away is
<br /> \varphi = \frac{q}{r}.<br />
Note we're using cgs units, not SI units.

The equation of an ellipse with foci z = \pm d and semimajor axis a along the z axis and semiminor axis a^2 - d^2 along the x axis in the xz plane
<br /> \frac{x^2}{a^2 - d^2} + \frac{z^2}{a^2} = 1.<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


Consider a small charge element dq of length dz&#039; of the rod, at position z&#039; on the z axis. Treating this small charge element as a point charge, the infinitesimal potential at (x,0,z) due to this charge element is
<br /> d\varphi(x,0,z) = \dfrac{dq}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z - z&#039;)^2}} = \dfrac{\lambda\,dz&#039;}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-z&#039;)^2}}.<br />
Integrating along the entire rod from z = -d to z = +d. we find the potential to be given by the integral
<br /> \varphi(x,0,z) = \int_{-d}^d \frac{\lambda\,dz&#039;}{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-z&#039;)^2}}<br />

If we make the trig substitution z - z&#039; = x\tan{\theta}, we get -dz&#039; = x\sec^2{\theta}\,d\theta and our integral becomes
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \varphi(x,0,z)<br /> &amp; = \int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2} \frac{-\lambda\, x\sec^2{\theta}\,d\theta}{\sqrt{x^2(1 + \tan^2{\theta})}} \\<br /> &amp; = \int_{\theta_2}^{\theta_1} \frac{\lambda\, x\sec^2{\theta}\,d\theta}{\sqrt{x^2 \sec^2{\theta}}} \\<br /> &amp; = \int_{\theta_2}^{\theta_1} \lambda\,\sec{\theta}\,d\theta \\<br /> &amp; = \lambda\, \text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{\sec{\theta_1} + \tan{\theta_1}}{\sec{\theta_2} + \tan{\theta_2}}<br /> \Big],<br /> \end{align*}<br />
where z - d = x\tan{\theta_2} and z + d = x\tan{\theta_1}, so that
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \sec{\theta_1} &amp; = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + (z + d)^2}}{x} \\<br /> \sec{\theta_2} &amp; = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 + (z-d)^2}}{x}.<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Then our integral becomes
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \varphi(x,0,z)<br /> &amp; =<br /> \lambda\, \text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{\frac{1}{x} \sqrt{x^2 + (z+d)^2} + \frac{1}{x}(z+d)}<br /> {\frac{1}{x} \sqrt{x^2 + (z-d)^2} + \frac{1}{x}(z-d)}<br /> \Big] \\<br /> &amp; =<br /> \lambda\, \text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{z + d + \sqrt{x^2 + (z+d)^2}}<br /> {z - d + \sqrt{x^2 + (z-d)^2}}<br /> \Big].<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Now from the ellipse equation we have
<br /> x^2 = (a^2 - d^2) \Big(1 - \frac{z^2}{a^2}\Big),<br />
and we thus find
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> x^2 + (z \pm d)^2 &amp; =<br /> (a^2 - d^2)\Big(1 - \frac{z^2}{a^2}\Big) + (z \pm d)^2 \\<br /> &amp; = \Big(a^2 - d^2 - z^2 + \frac{d^2}{a^2}z^2\Big) + (z^2 \pm 2d z + d^2) \\<br /> &amp; = a^2 + \frac{d^2}{a^2}z^2 \pm 2d z \\<br /> &amp; = \frac{1}{a^2}\Big(d^2 z^2 \pm 2 a^2 d z + a^4\Big) \\<br /> &amp; = \frac{1}{a^2}(d z \pm a^2)^2<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Thus we find
<br /> \sqrt{x^2 + (z \pm d)^2} = \frac{1}{a} \lvert d z \pm a^2\rvert<br />
so that our expression for the potential at point (x,0,z) becomes
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \varphi(x,0,z)<br /> &amp; = \text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{z + d + \lvert dz + a^2\rvert/a}{z - d + \lvert dz - a^2\rvert/a}<br /> \Big] \\<br /> &amp; = \text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{a z + a d + \lvert dz + a^2\rvert}{a z - a d + \lvert dz - a^2\rvert}<br /> \Big]<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Now I'm lost as to how to get rid of the z term so that
<br /> \varphi(x,0,z) = F(a,d)<br />
for some function F independent of x,z, as the problem requests us to find.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's just for the minute assume x &gt; 0 also.
 
I think I figured it out now. Always seems to happen right after I type up the whole problem here!
 
By the symmetry of the problem sign of x,z doesn't matter, so I'll just take both positive. Then \lvert dz - a^2\vert = a^2 - dz and \lvert dz + a^2\rvert = dz + a^2, so the expression for the potential becomes
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \varphi(x,0,z)<br /> &amp; =<br /> \lambda\,\text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{az + ad + a^2 + dz}{az - ad + a^2 - dz}<br /> \Big] \\<br /> &amp; =<br /> \lambda\,\text{ln}\Big[<br /> \frac{a(z + a) + d(z+a)}{a(z+a) - d(z+a)}<br /> \Big] \\<br /> &amp; = \lambda\,\text{ln}\Big[\frac{a+d}{a-d}\Big].<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Now I just have to check the separate cases x = 0, z = a and x = \sqrt{a^2 - d^2}, z = 0.
 
This was a cool problem. Man I love Purcell.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top