Solving an Integral with Wave Packet: Find \varphi(k)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the integral \varphi(k) = \int B(k)\cos(kx) dk from 0 to infinity, where B(k) = exp(-a²k²). Participants explore using integral tables and recognize that the integrand is even, allowing the integral to be simplified to \frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty B(k)\cos(kx)\,dk. Despite attempts, the presence of error functions complicates the evaluation, prompting questions about alternative methods. Suggestions include using the Fourier transform approach by expressing cos kx as the real part of e^(ikx). Ultimately, the integral can be evaluated exactly due to the specified limits.
12504106
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the wave packet \varphi(k) = \int B(k)cos(kx) dk from 0 to infinity and B(k) = exp(^{-a^{2}k^{2}}). Find \varphi(k)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



After looking up integral tables, i got an expression involving error function (erf) and imaginary error function (erfi) which i don't know how to continue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integrand is an even function, so you can write

\int_0^\infty B(k)\cos(kx)\,dk = \frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty B(k)\cos(kx)\,dk

Does that help?
 
vela said:
The integrand is an even function, so you can write

\int_0^\infty B(k)\cos(kx)\,dk = \frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty B(k)\cos(kx)\,dk

Does that help?

But i will still end up with those error function which i can't evaluate. Is there any method which does not involve the error function?
 
But i will still end up with those error function. Is there any method which will not involve the error functions?
 
Not really, but you can evaluate the integral exactly because of the limits.

There is another approach you can try: Write cos kx as the real part of eikx. Then the integral is a Fourier transform, which you can look up in a table.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
980
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top