Solving Buoyancy Problem: Ball Emerges from Water Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hitman6267
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
AI Thread Summary
A small ball is released from a depth of 0.610 m in water, with a density 0.290 that of water, and the drag force is negligible. The initial approach using mg = mf * g was ineffective due to a mistake in density cancellation. Applying Newton's second law and kinematics led to a successful resolution of the problem. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physical laws to solve buoyancy-related questions. Ultimately, the correct method provided the solution to how high the ball would shoot above the water surface.
Hitman6267
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Question
Suppose that you release a small ball from rest at a depth of 0.610 m below the surface in a pool of water. If the density of the ball is 0.290 that of water and if the drag force on the ball from the water is negligible, how high above the water surface will the ball shoot as it emerges from the water? (Neglect any transfer of energy to the splashing and waves produced by the emerging ball.)

My attempt
I tried mg = m_{f} * g

but it didn't get me anywhere

Any ideas ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you apply Newton's second law on it? Then a little kinematics will help.
 
It worked thank you :)

I tried it, but a mistake kept the density from cancelling out. I retried it after your suggestion and it worked.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top