Solving Energy Levels of 2-Spin 1/2 System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the energy levels of a two-spin 1/2 system in an external magnetic field, represented by a Hamiltonian that includes spin operators S1 and S2. The user is attempting to solve the eigenvalue equation H|ψ⟩ = E|ψ⟩, using a basis of spin states. They express uncertainty about calculating the eigenvalues and consider the use of Pauli matrices, noting that S1 and S2 commute. Suggestions include expanding the wavefunction in the spin basis and exploring conditions under which the result is a constant multiple of |ψ⟩. The conversation emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to solve the problem effectively.
ghostflame
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the energy levels of a 2-spin 1/2 system with spinoperators S1 and S2 in an external magnetic field. The hamiltonian is of the form,

H= A ( 1-\frac{2S_{1}}{h} . \frac{2 S_{2}}{h} )+ \frac{\mu B}{h}(S_{1,z}+S_{2,z})

The h is a h-bar, constants A, B, and S1 and S2 the spin operators

Homework Equations



I have to solve the equation H l\psi> = El\psi>

The Attempt at a Solution



The spin system is has a basis, l\uparrow\uparrow>,\left| \uparrow\downarrow>,\left|\downarrow\uparrow>,\left|\downarrow\downarrow>

so any \left| \psi> is a linear combination of the basis above, but i don't know how i can calculate the eigenvalues of the above equation. I have a feeling i have to use the Pauli matrices but iam not sure. Anyone has an idea? It should be a 3 level system...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know the matrices S1 and S2 commute, is also know that S1,z + S2,z = S,z

couldn't that help?
 
Why not try expanding your wavefunction into the spin basis and then using that to calculate H|\psi\rangle? Under what circumstances is your result a constant multiple of |\psi\rangle?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top