Solving for Charge Position from Flux and Gaussian Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alem2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the relationship between electric flux and charge position using Gauss's law. The original poster is unsure if they can determine the location of a charge solely from the flux and dimensions of a Gaussian surface. It is clarified that there are two definitions of flux, with the second being a generalization applicable to various surfaces, while the first is limited to flat surfaces. Additionally, the radius used in Gauss's law refers to the Gaussian surface rather than the distance to the charge itself. This distinction helps resolve the confusion about the calculations involved.
Alem2000
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I was a bit confused by a homwork problem that I was working on. The problem is that I found the flux of a charge and I know the demsions of the Gaussian surface it is encolsed in. It doesn't seem right intuitively to be able to find the location of the charge from this information...but mathmatically I am thinking I can solve for r.
\Phi=\oint _\mathcal{S} \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{a} = \frac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon _0}
and since electric field is the flux over the area i can find it by
E=\Phi/A
so shouldn't I be able to find the position fo the charge from
\Phi/A=q/4\pi r^2 \epsilon_0
this is really confusing, do I have the theory wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you have two different definitions for flux:

\Phi = E A

and

\Phi=\oint \vec{E}\cdot \vec{da}

Notice how the second definition is a generalization of the first one. The first equation only applies to flat surfaces which are perpendicular to the field, the second definition works in general.

Also, the r that you pulled out of Gauss' law is the radius of a spherical Gaussian surface (an hence the place you are looking at the field) , not "the distance to the charge".
 
THANK YOU, that makes a lot more sense now!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top