Solving Induction Proof for Positive Integers: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter scottstapp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
scottstapp
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is my first proof by induction so I need some assistance

If n is a positive integer, then \sum1/(k(k+1))from k=1 to n is equal to n/(n+1)



Homework Equations


I'm not sure if this is useful for this proof but we are given the proposition:
let n be a positive integer. Then the sum of the first n positive integers is equal to (n(n+1))/2.


The Attempt at a Solution


(1) Let S be the set of all positive integers k such that 1/2+1/6+...+1/k(k+1)= n/(n+1)
(2) 1 is in S because 1/1(1+1)=1/2 which is in S (not sure if this is the correct approach)
(3) Let n be any element of S and let t=n+1

Am I on the right track? For my next step would I just substitute t=n+1 and solve?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try decomposing

<br /> \frac{1}{k(k+1)}<br />

into partial fractions, and writing your original sum in terms of those partial fractions.
 
Thank you statdad I believe this helped but am still curious about my step (2).
Here is what I have changed:

(1)Let S be the set of all positive integers k such that 1/2+(1/2)(1/3)+...+(1/k)(k+1)= n/(n+1)
(2) 1 is in S because (1/1)(1/2)=1/2 which is in S (not sure if this is the correct approach)
(3) Let n be any element of S and let t=n+1
(4) (1/1)(1/2)+(1/2)(1/3)+...+(1/n)(1/n+1)+(1/t)(1/t+1)=(n/(n+1))+(1/t)(1/t+1)
(5) n=t-1
(6) Substituting this into the right hand side leads to: t/(t+1)

I'm pretty sure that's the way to do it I did the algebra for step 6 but did not want to include all the steps. Is (2) correctly justified?

Thanks again
 
Step (2) in your proof is hard to argue with. There's only one term in the sum which is 1/(1*2) And your formula for the sum of the series F(n)=n/(n+1) is also 1/2. I'm not really following what you did for the other steps. You want to prove F(n+1)-F(n)=1/((n+1)*(n+2)), right? Since that's the extra term you added on to the series. I'm pretty unclear on what algebra you actually did. BTW statdad was pointing out a noninductive way to prove it using telescoping series.
 
Last edited:
No, I do not want to prove F(n+1)-F(n)=1/((n+1)*(n+2)).

Here is my algebra for my last step, maybe it will clarify things:

once we let n=t-1 and plug it into (n/(n+1))+(1/t)(1/t+1) we get the following:
((t-1)/t)+(1/(t(t+1))) finding a common denominator gives ((t+1)(t-1)+1)/(t(t+1))

Multiplying out the numerator gives t2/(t(t+1))

A t in the numerator and denominator cancel giving t/(t+1)
Therefore t is in the form we are looking to prove therefore meaning that t=n+1 exists in S.

Does this make sense now?
 
Ah, I see. Your n/(n+1) is my F(n). Your (1/t)(1/t+1) is my 1/((n+1)*(n+2)). Your t/(t+1) is my F(n+1). So you've proved F(n)+1/((n+1)*(n+2))=F(n+1). Same thing. Sorry, I think the t was throwing me off.
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top