MHB Solving Inequality: 0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

  • Thread starter Thread starter ATroelstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality 0 <= 6x^3 - 24x^2 + 6x - 10, the expression can be simplified to 3x^3 - 12x^2 + 3x - 5 >= 0. Factoring may not be straightforward, and it is suggested to find the real roots using technology, as the rational root theorem indicates no simple rational roots exist. Graphing the function reveals that the only root is slightly greater than -1, indicating the inequality holds for values of x less than this root. The discussion emphasizes the importance of testing intervals based on the identified roots to determine where the inequality is satisfied.
ATroelstein
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ATroelstein said:
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.

I would leave it in the form below and solve the LHS and use the real roots of the cubic equation to get intervals to test on.
$6x^3 - 24x^2+ 6x - 10 \geq 0$
$3x^3 - 12x^2+3x-5 \geq 0$

It doesn't look like this one factors easily so you might have to use technology to find the real root(s)
 
ATroelstein said:
I am trying to solve the following inequality:

x3 <= 7x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10

I have worked it out as follows:

0 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x - 10
You are fine to here.

10 <= 6x3 - 24x2 + 6x
There is never any good reason to shift that constant to the other side. Knowing that "xy= A" where A is non-zero doesn't tell you anything.
Instead, not that you can divide both sides by the positive number, 2, to get 0<= 3x3- 12x2+ 3x- 5

Now, the only possible rational roots are 5, -5, 1/3, -1/2, 5/3, and -5/3 and it is easy to that none of those are roots. The only root is irrational. Graphing gives a root just a little larger than -1. And the inequality is true for x less than that number.

10 <= 6x(x2 - 4x + 1)

At this point, I'm not sure how to proceed and I'm not sure if the factoring on the last step was helpful. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top