Solving Mechanics Question: Show Energy of Motion in x-z Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Varnson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the energy of a particle sliding under gravity in the x-z plane, defined by the equation z = b - (x^2/a). The total energy E is expressed as E = 0.5m*xdot^2*[1+(2x/a)^2] + mgb[1-(x^2/ab)]. Participants clarify the relationship between kinetic and potential energy, emphasizing the equation T(A) + V(A) = T(B) + V(B). The kinetic energy term is particularly challenging, with one participant noting the need to calculate the velocity components, specifically using the relationship v^2 = dot z^2 + dot x^2. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding both kinetic and potential energy in solving mechanics problems.
Varnson
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle slides under gravity along a smooth path in the x-z plane by z=b-(x^2/a).
Show that the energy of this motion can be expressed as E=.5m*xdot^2*[1+(2x/a)^2] + mgb[1-(x^2/ab)]


Homework Equations


T(A)+V(A) = T(B)+V(B), where T is kinetic energy


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how to get the potential energy term, but I am confused on how to calculate the kinetic term.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v^2=\dot z^2+\dot x^2

\dot z=-\frac{2x\dot x}{a}
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top