Solving Problem 4 of DJ Griffiths Electrodynamics Chapter 9

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving Problem 4 from Chapter 9 of DJ Griffiths' Electrodynamics, specifically obtaining equation 20 using the method of separation of variables. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the wave equation and the separation ansatz as key steps in solving linear partial differential equations. One user expresses gratitude for guidance while indicating they have made progress but still seek assistance. The conversation highlights the necessity of familiarity with separation of variables for effective problem-solving in electrodynamics. Overall, the thread serves as a collaborative effort to clarify and solve a specific physics problem.
Zeeshan Ahmad
Gold Member
Messages
24
Reaction score
9
Thread moved from the technical forums, and the OP has been reminded to show their work.
Homework Statement
Obtain eq 20(show in the below picture)
Directly from the waves equation by separation of variable
Relevant Equations
linear combinations of sinusoidal waves
While I was doing a problems of chapter 9 of DJ griffith electrodynamics

I came across this problem 4
Problem statement
Obtain eq 20(show in the below picture)
Directly from the waves equation by separation of variable
IMG_20210916_113300.jpg

Could I have a straight solution in your word
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, but some help to find the solution yourself. Roughly speaking you just need to do two steps (which are always the same for such linear partial differential equations!):

(a) write down the wave equation
(b) write down the separation ansatz, plug it into the wave equation and find the corresponding mode functions
 
  • Like
Likes vela and berkeman
Are you familiar with the method of separation of variables for solving PDEs? It's definitely something you should learn, if not.
 
I have posted it in the morning and done it up till when I got response to it
But thanks for the response 😊
From mr vanhees and vela
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top