Solving Schrodinger's Eqn for Quantum Ring: Boundary Conditions?

Haxx0rm4ster
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
When solving Schrodinger's eqn for a quantum ring, what would be the boundary conditions?

The solution (polar) should be
Ψ(Φ) = A exp(ikΦ) + B exp(-ikΦ)

And I believe the boundary conditions are
Ψ(0) = Ψ(2pi)
Ψ(0) = A + B
Ψ(2pi) = A exp(ik*2π) + B exp(ik*2π)


and I suppose I can safely say that
Ψ(0) = 0

From these conditions/assumptions,
k = n, n = 1,2,3...
B = -A,

And therefore
Ψ(Φ) = A exp(inΦ) - A exp(-inΦ)

Which can be expressed as
Ψ(Φ) = 2Ai sin(nΦ)

I'm just wondering, are my boundary condition assumptions complete and correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No the phi(0) = 0 boundary condition is not a good one. This eliminates and cosine behavior in the wavefunction. Your second boundary condition is that the wavefunction be continuously differentiable.
 
Hey, sorry to hijack your thread but what's a quantum ring? I'm curious.
 
By quantum ring, I'm referring to something like a quantum wire looped around in the shape of a ring.
 
The correct boundary condition is periodicity: Ψ(Φ) = Ψ(Φ+2π).
 
Which he already used, so the periodicity of the derivative is the other boundary condition.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top