A Solving Schrödinger's Equation with a Smooth Potential Wall: A Detailed Guide

paul159753
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I'm looking for help for an exercise of the chapter III. Schrödinger's equation, §25 The transmission coefficient (problem 3).
Hello everyone,

I'm looking for help for the problem 3 of the chapter III. Schrödinger's equation, §25 The transmission coefficient of the Volume 3 of the Landau-Lifshitz book (non-relativistic QM).

In this exercise Landau considers a smooth potential wall $$\frac{U_0}{1 + \exp{\left(-\alpha x \right)}}.$$ We search solutions for ##E > U_0##.
So we have to solve $$\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi + \frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\left(E - \frac{U_0}{1 + \exp{\left(-\alpha x \right)}}\right)\Psi = 0.$$ We do the change of variable ##\xi = -\exp{\left(-\alpha x \right)}##. We write the derivative operator $$\frac{d^2}{dx^2}= \left(\frac{d\xi}{dx}\frac{d}{d\xi}\right)^2 = \alpha^2 \xi \frac{d}{d\xi} + \alpha^2 \xi ^2 \frac{d^2}{d\xi^2}.$$ Noting ##k_2^2 = 2m(E-U_0)/\hbar^2,\ k_1^2 = 2mE/\hbar^2## we can rewrite the equation $$\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi + \left(\frac{k_2^2 - \xi k_1 ^2}{1 - \xi}\right)\Psi = 0.$$ We look for solutions of the form ##\Psi = \xi ^{-ik_2/\alpha} \omega(\xi)##. Multiplying the equation by ##1-\xi## and dividing by ##\alpha^2 \xi \xi ^{-ik_2/\alpha}## we get the following equation for ##\omega(\xi)## : $$ \xi(1-\xi)\frac{d^2}{d\xi^2}\omega(\xi) + (1-\xi)\left(1 - 2ik_2 / \alpha\right)\frac{d}{d\xi}\omega(\xi) + \left((k_2^2 - k_1^2)/\alpha^2 - ik_2/\alpha \frac{(1-\xi)}{\xi} \right)\omega(\xi) = 0.$$
My problem is that Landau found $$\xi(1-\xi)\frac{d^2}{d\xi^2}\omega(\xi) + (1-\xi)\left(1 - 2ik_2 / \alpha\right)\frac{d}{d\xi}\omega(\xi) + \left((k_2^2 - k_1^2)/\alpha^2 \right)\omega(\xi) = 0, $$ so the same thing but without the ##- ik_2/\alpha \frac{(1-\xi)}{\xi}\omega(\xi)## term. So he gets an hypergeometric equation and I don't. I don't know where my mistakes are.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
paul159753 said:
Multiplying the equation by ##1-\xi## and dividing by ##\alpha^2 \xi \xi ^{-ik_2/\alpha}## we get the following equation for ##\omega(\xi)## : $$ \xi(1-\xi)\frac{d^2}{d\xi^2}\omega(\xi) + (1-\xi)\left(1 - 2ik_2 / \alpha\right)\frac{d}{d\xi}\omega(\xi) + \left((k_2^2 - k_1^2)/\alpha^2 - ik_2/\alpha \frac{(1-\xi)}{\xi} \right)\omega(\xi) = 0.$$
My problem is that Landau found $$\xi(1-\xi)\frac{d^2}{d\xi^2}\omega(\xi) + (1-\xi)\left(1 - 2ik_2 / \alpha\right)\frac{d}{d\xi}\omega(\xi) + \left((k_2^2 - k_1^2)/\alpha^2 \right)\omega(\xi) = 0, $$ so the same thing but without the ##- ik_2/\alpha \frac{(1-\xi)}{\xi}\omega(\xi)## term. So he gets an hypergeometric equation and I don't. I don't know where my mistakes are.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks !
When you expand the Schrodinger equation out, you should get cancellation of all the terms proportional to ##i\omega(\xi)##. It looks like you just have a simple algebra error buried in your work somewhere. Try writing out explicitly your result for $$\frac{1}{\alpha^2}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi$$
The offending terms should cancel in that step.
 
I'm really dumb, I see where my mistake was thanks !
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top