Solving Spin Problem: S^2 & Probabilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adamantus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the measurement of spin in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding two particles with different spins and the implications of measuring S^2 and S(z). Initially, the user questions the simplicity of finding eigenvalues for S^2 but later realizes the need for further clarification on the second part of the problem. The focus shifts to determining possible values for S^2 and their probabilities after measuring total S(z) and one particle's S(z). The conversation highlights the importance of using Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for adding angular momenta and suggests that explicitly working through known spins is more manageable than deriving coefficients from variables. The user expresses confidence in applying this method for their upcoming exam, emphasizing the professor's repeated emphasis on similar problems.
Adamantus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to study for exams and can't get a hold of my professor. Anyway, I'm trying to figure out a problem regarding spin. You're given two particles of different spin and the S^2 is measured. It asks for the possible values you could measure, but wouldn't that just be the eigenvalues defined by S^2|sm>=hbar^2*s(s+1)|sm>? That just seems too easy. (edit: I realized what to do on this part...I was just being stupid. I'm still having trouble with the second part).

And for the second part, you're given the result after measuring the total S(z) and the S(z) of one of the particles. It then asks for what possible values you could get for S^2 and their probabilities. But, and I'm probably misunderstanding the question, isn't the result going to still be s*(s+1), which, considering the spins haven't changed, wouldn't have changed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you should use the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for adding angular momenta. But if you want to do it explicitly (as you'd probably have to do on your exam if it was a question) post the two spins you're adding and your work and we can help you along.

It's easier to handle it with known spins than to derive the equation for the coefficients with variables.
 
i actually used the clebsch-gordan right before you replied. I am pretty sure that's how ill do it on the exam, since my professor kept repeating throughout the year that we'd have a problem like that on the exam (and have to use the tables). i guess his constant repetition didn't help
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top