Solving systems of equations with complex numbers

AI Thread Summary
To solve systems of linear equations involving complex numbers, one can treat the equations similarly to those with real coefficients. The process involves using standard methods such as substitution or elimination without needing to separate real and imaginary parts. Some participants noted that the approach remains consistent regardless of whether the coefficients are complex or real. There was a request for more detailed guidance, but it was emphasized that the methods do not change significantly. Understanding that complex coefficients can be handled like real ones simplifies the solving process.
juicev85
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I can easily solve systems of equations with no complex numbers, could somebody give a short overview of the easiest way to do this by hand.

thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
juicev85 said:
I can easily solve systems of equations with no complex numbers, could somebody give a short overview of the easiest way to do this by hand.

thanks

I'm guessing from your statement about easily solving that you mean linear systems. In that case, you can split the real and imaginary parts apart and get two separate sets of equations each of which can be solved (as real systems).
 
yes, i need to be able to solve a system of linear equations which include complex numbers. The method you described sounds perfect, is there any way I could get a little more detail?
 
juicev85 said:
yes, i need to be able to solve a system of linear equations which include complex numbers. The method you described sounds perfect, is there any way I could get a little more detail?

Not to my knowledge. I can't figure out what more you might want.
 
Linear equations with complex coefficients can be solved in precisely the same manner as linear equations with real coefficients.
There is no need to split up in real&complex parts.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top