Solving Tension on Slope w/ 2 Packages

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjavier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in the rope connecting two sliding packages on a ramp inclined at 30 degrees. Package A, with a mass of 4 kg and a kinetic friction coefficient of 0.3, is 6m down the ramp, while Package B, weighing 8 kg with a coefficient of 0.2, is 4m above A. The initial confusion stems from the teacher's assertion that the tension is zero due to the rope being slack, despite the user's calculations suggesting otherwise. The user attempts to derive the tension using force equations for both packages but struggles to reconcile the results, particularly regarding the accelerations and the implications of friction coefficients. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify the relationship between tension and acceleration in this system.
cjavier
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The question: Two packages have just started sliding down a ramp that forms an angle of 30 degrees with the horizontal. They are connected with a rope. Package A is 6m up along the ramp, with a mass of 4 kg and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.3. Package B is directly above 4 m further up the ramp, with mass of 8kg and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.2. The packages are placed such that if B began moving and A did not, B would have to go through A to move down, i.e they cannot pass each other on the side.

1) Find the tension in the rope just after they start sliding.
2) Find the velocity of both packages when package A arrives at the bottom of the ramp.

I am not sure how to approach this problem. My teacher wrote on my test that T=0 because the rope is slack. He then wrote that the final velocity of package A was 5.5m/s (although I cannot read his handwriting) and that the final velocity of package B was 7.7m/s.

Please help! My approach was to sum the forces in the direction of the ramp for each box like so:

BOX A: ƩFx = mbox-aa = mgsin(30) - T - μkmgcos(30)
BOX B: ƩFx = mbox-ba = mgsin(30) + T - μkmgcos(30)

But I could not derive T becoming 0. Thank you all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If T > 0 then the two accelerations are the same.
a = gsin(30) - T/ma - μkagcos(30)
a = gsin(30) + T/mb - μkbgcos(30)
What do you get if you combine those equations, eliminating a, and use the fact that μka > μkb?
 
haruspex said:
If T > 0 then the two accelerations are the same.
a = gsin(30) - T/ma - μkagcos(30)
a = gsin(30) + T/mb - μkbgcos(30)
What do you get if you combine those equations, eliminating a, and use the fact that μka > μkb?

I'm not quite sure what I am supposed to get. I get T/ma + T/mb= -gcos(30)
[I substituted μka with 2 and μkb with 1 for simplicity]
 
cjavier said:
I'm not quite sure what I am supposed to get. I get T/ma + T/mb= -gcos(30)
[I substituted μka with 2 and μkb with 1 for simplicity]
So can T be positive?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top