Solving the De Broglie Problem: Calculating Length of a 1-D Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter psingh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the length of a one-dimensional box for an electron in the n=1 state, equating its energy to that of a photon with a 500 nm wavelength. The initial formula presented, E=h^2/8mL^2, is debated, with suggestions that it should involve hbar instead of h. Participants clarify that the correct energy expression for the box is E=π²ħ²/2mL², while the photon's energy is E=ħω=2πħc/λ. Ultimately, the correct length formula is identified as L=√(πħλ/4mc), indicating that the original calculations likely contained an arithmetic error. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct constants and formulas in quantum mechanics calculations.
psingh
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the length of a one-dimensional box in which an electron in the n=1 state has the same energy as a photon with a wavelength of 500 nm


Homework Equations




E=h^2/8mL^2 and E=hc/lambda

making it
L=sqrt( (h*lambda)/(8cm) )


The Attempt at a Solution



I plugged in for those numbers and did not come out with the correct number. any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that 8 should not be a 4?
 
The eightfold way is right here. 1/8=(L/2)^/2.
I think your first h should be hbar.
 
Hey
The energy if the first state of an indefinite one-dimensional box is:
E=\frac{\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2mL^{2}}
Where m is the mass of the particle and L is the length of the box.
The photon has the energy given by
E=\hbar\omega=\frac{2\pi\hbar{c}}{\lambda}
Where \lambda is the wave length.
And therefore the length L is L=\sqrt{\frac{\pi\hbar\lambda{c}}{4m}}
 
Last edited:
eys_physics said:
And therefore the length L is L=\sqrt{\frac{\pi\hbar\lambda{c}}{4m}}

Which is wrong. It should be \sqrt{\frac{\pi\hbar\lambda}{4mc}, which is identical to what the OP psingh had written correctly. Replacing h by 2\pi\hbar won't do any good.

Perhaps the OP made some arithmetical mistake...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top