MHB Solving the Equation: x+[2x]+[3x]=7

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x+[2x]+[3x]=7 is discussed as an easy problem, prompting questions about its posting. Participants categorize real numbers into various sets based on whether they are integers or non-integers and their relationships with 2x and 3x. A reference to Desmos suggests that the equation appears to imply x = 4/3, but this is incorrect as it does not satisfy the equation. The correct interpretation indicates that 4/3 leads to a left-hand side of 8, not matching the right-hand side of 7. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful analysis in solving such equations.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
An easy one:

x+[2x]+[3x]=7
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is an easy problem! Why did you post it?

I would start by dividing the real numbers into classes:
1) The set of integers.
2) The set of non-integer, x, such that 2x is an integer
3) The set of non-integers, x, such that 2x is not an integer but 3x is.
4) The set of non-integers, x, such that neither 2x nor 3x is an integer but 6x is.
5) The set all other real numbers.
 
Because RHS is integer so LHS is integer

As $\lfloor 2x \rfloor$ and $\lfloor 3x \rfloor$ are integers so x is integer so $\lfloor 2x \rfloor = 2x $ and $\lfloor 3x \rfloor = 3x$

so x + 2x + 3x = 6x = 7 so $x = \frac{7}{6}$ which is not integer so NO solution
 
Beer soaked ramblings follow.
solakis said:
An easy one:

x+[2x]+[3x]=7
Desmos somehow gives the impression that $x + \lfloor 2x \rfloor + \lfloor 3x \rfloor = 7$ is basically the line $x = \frac{4}{3}$.
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/stz3o2wn2h
 
The answer given by Kaliprasad is the right one 7\6 is not an integer
4/3 is not a solution of the above equation LHS is 8 RHS Is 7
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top