Solving the Laplace Equation for a Capacitor Setup

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Laplace equation for a capacitor setup involving two parallel circular disc electrodes charged to potentials +U and -U, separated by a distance of 2H. The user is uncertain about the boundary conditions necessary for the solution, which include potential values at specific z-coordinates and conditions for the electric field at the boundaries. The user presents several equations and conditions but seeks confirmation on their accuracy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining boundary conditions for accurate potential distribution calculations. Assistance is requested to validate these conditions for the problem at hand.
hectoryx
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




The capacitor is assumed to consist of two parallel circular disc electrodes of radius R. The electrodes are of infinite small thickness, placed a distance 2H apart, and are equally and oppositely charged to potentials +U and -U. A metal cylinder is placed near the two electrodes and the position relationship can be found in the following picture:

http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af335/hectoryx/professional/1.jpg


Homework Equations



To solve the potential distribution in this situation, the Laplace Equation in cylindrical coordinate system is:

\[{\nabla ^2}\phi = \frac{1}{r}\frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial r}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}\phi }}{{\partial {r^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}\phi }}{{\partial {z^2}}} = 0\]

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure about its boundary condition:

\[\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {\phi = + {\rm{U}},\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {} &amp; {{\rm{z}} = {\rm{H}}} \\<br /> \end{array},0 \le r \le {\rm{R }}} \\<br /> {\phi = - {\rm{U}},\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {} &amp; {{\rm{z}} = - {\rm{H}}} \\<br /> \end{array},0 \le r \le {\rm{R}}} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right.\]

and

\[\begin{array}{l}<br /> \phi = {\phi _c},\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {} &amp; {{\rm{H}} + {\rm{d}} \le {\rm{z}} \le {\rm{H}}} \\<br /> \end{array} + {\rm{d}} + {\rm{L}},0 \le r \le {\rm{R}} \\ <br /> \frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial z}} = {\sigma _1},\frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial r}} = 0,\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {} &amp; {{\rm{z}} = {\rm{H}} + {\rm{d}}} \\<br /> \end{array},0 \le r \le {\rm{R}} \\ <br /> \frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial z}} = {\sigma _2},\frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial r}} = 0,\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {} &amp; {{\rm{z}} = {\rm{H}} + {\rm{d}}} \\<br /> \end{array} + {\rm{L}},0 \le r \le {\rm{R}} \\ <br /> \frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial z}} = 0,\frac{{\partial \phi }}{{\partial r}} = {\sigma _3},\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {} &amp; {{\rm{H}} + {\rm{d}} \le {\rm{z}} \le {\rm{H}}} \\<br /> \end{array} + {\rm{d}} + {\rm{L}},r = {\rm{R}} \\ <br /> \end{array}\]<br />


Could anyone give me some help and tell me that whether the boundary conditions above are right?

Thanks very much!

Best Regards.

Hector
 
Physics news on Phys.org


chould anyone help me please? Really thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top