Solving Troublesome Integral: Quantum Mechanics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter genxhis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the momentum space wave function from the given quantum mechanics problem involving the function Ψ(x,0) = A/(x^2 + a^2). The integral for the Fourier transform, Φ(p, 0), presents challenges due to singularities at x = ia and x = -ia, which require complex analysis techniques for evaluation. Users highlight that Mathematica provides a solution in terms of the Meijer G-function, but there is confusion regarding the necessity of complex analysis for understanding the singularities. The conversation emphasizes the importance of evaluating residues and choosing the correct contour for integration based on the sign of x. Overall, the thread underscores the complexity of the problem and the need for a solid grasp of complex analysis to resolve it effectively.
genxhis
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
A quantum mechanics problem calls for the reader to find the momentum space wave function of \Psi(x,0) = A/(x^2 + a^2). But I do not know how to resolve the Fourier transform:

\Phi(p, 0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i p x/\hbar} \frac{A}{x^2+a^2}dx.​

The problem implies an exact solution can be found since it subsequantly asks you to check normalization and compute the expected values of p and p2 using the transformed fn. Mathematica evaluates the transform in terms of a special fn MeijerG.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral has singularities at x = ia and x = -ia. To evaluate the integral you need evaluate the residues resulting from closing the path either in the upper half plane (Im z > 0) or the lower half plane (Im x < 0) depending on the sign of x (i.e. with a semicircle whose radius approaches infinity).
 
Last edited:
Singularities? I don't understand. The integrand is well-defined for all real values x and the integral almost certainly exists over any range. Sorry, I have not had a course in complex analysis.
 
genxhis,

Sorry about that - I edited my original post to reflect the correct locations of the singularities.

I assumed you were familiar with complex analysis but, since you're not, what I said won't make sense to you. I'll have to think a bit about how to do it without invoking complex analysis.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top