Solving Two Bosons in a Box Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Henk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Box
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the problem of two spinless bosons in a box with periodic boundary conditions. The normalized wavefunction for distinct momenta p and q is correctly expressed as a symmetric combination of individual wavefunctions. For the case where p equals q, the wavefunction simplifies to a specific form involving a factor of two. The main challenge presented is to demonstrate that the probability density for distinct momenta is greater than that for identical momenta at the same position. Participants are encouraged to improve their LaTeX formatting to facilitate clearer communication of mathematical expressions.
Henk
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm having some difficulties with the following problem:

Consider two (spinless)free bosons in a box of volume V with periodic boundary conditions. Let the momenta of the bosons be p and q.
a) Write down the normalized wavefunction for p is not equal to q and p = q.

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2)

I thought since they are bosons Y has to be symmetric thus:

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\varphi_{p}(r1)\varphi_{q}(r2)+ \varphi_{p}(r2)\varphi_{q}(r1))

Where


\varphi_{p}(r1)\varphi_{q}(r2) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(e^(i(p \cdot r1))(e^(i(q \cdot r2))


and


\varphi_{p}(r2)\varphi_{q}(r1) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(e^(i(p \cdot r2))(e^(i(q \cdot r1))


For p=q this means:

\Psi_{pq}(r1,r2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}(2e^(i(k \cdot (r1+r2)))

b) Show that for p is not equal to q:

\Psi_{pq}(r,r)|^2 > |\Psi_{pp}(r,r)|^2

But I don't know how to do this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to fix your latex.
 
I tried but the weird thing is that it even gives a mistake if I try something simpel as \frac{1}{2}
 
try writing it without the stuff. Then people who know latex can at least read it with a bit of difficulty.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top