I Some help with deriving svedberg equilibrium equatio please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the analytical solution of the centrifugation equilibrium equation in analytical ultracentrifugation. A user seeks clarification on the mathematical steps involved in manipulating the equation, particularly after removing the frictional coefficient and rearranging terms. They express uncertainty about the calculus concepts needed to progress from one equation to another, specifically regarding derivatives and logarithmic transformations. Other participants provide guidance on the necessary calculus principles and suggest using the homework template for future questions. The conversation highlights the importance of foundational math skills in understanding complex physical chemistry equations.
HS-experiment
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hello Physics Forums,

I am studying the equations related to analytical ultracentrifugation. The equation I am interested in describes centrifugation equilibrium, ie at the point in time when sedimentation is balanced with diffusion in the ultracentrifuge. Fortunately, unlike the Lamm equation, this one can be solved analytically.

I found the following in a textbook. Can someone please explain to me the steps taken going from the first equation to the next?

## \frac {RT}{Nf } \frac{dC}{dr} = \frac{M(1-\bar vp)w^2rC}{Nf} ##

We now write the derivative as dC/dr, because at equilibrium, C is a function only of r, not also of t. We can factor out the Nf on both sides and again rearrange to

## \frac{dln(C)}{d(r^2)}=\frac{M(1-\bar vp)w^2}{2RT} ##

where
R = gas constant
T = temperature
N = avogadro's number
f = frictional coefficient
C = concentration of solute
r = distance from center of rotor
M = molar mass
## \bar v ## = partial specific volume
p = density of solvent
## w^2 ## = rotational velocity
In particular, I don't know what to do after I remove Nf and move RT to the right hand side of the equation.

## \frac{dC}{dr}=\frac{M(1-\bar vp)w^2rC}{RT} ##

I think that it is something simple, but my math ability is really bad.

Many thanks.

BTW This is taken fom the textbook 'Principles of Physical Biochemistry', second edition.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a little first year calculus: ## \frac{d \, \ln{C}}{dC}=\frac{1}{C} ## so that ## \frac{dC}{C}=d ( \ln{C}) ##. Meanwhile ## \frac{d (r^2)}{dr}=2r ## so that ## r \, dr=\frac{1}{2} d( r^2) ##. ## \\ ## Recommendation is to use the homework template next time and post in the homework section. I think this one is ok where it is, but the Mentors might move it to the homework section.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes HS-experiment
Hi Charles. Thanks a lot for your explanation and sorry if I placed this question in the wrong directory. My calculus course is coming back to me through a haze .. I forgot that when you are taking a derivative you need to add the fraction in front ## \frac{1}{2}d(r^2) ## to end up with the correct answer. I should really take a refresher course some time :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top