Someone help. Sequence and continuous functions.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding limits in sequences and continuous functions. It emphasizes that one does not know the minimum and maximum values in advance when solving these problems. The example provided illustrates how to approximate limits by focusing on the highest powers in the numerator and denominator, leading to the conclusion that the limit approaches zero. The conversation highlights that finding limits involves a process of simplification and approximation rather than strict rules. Ultimately, understanding these concepts requires practice and familiarity with different types of functions.
Charles007
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am confused with sequence and continuous functions.

I am confued with their limit. how do they know the min and max before they attempt the question. and is that the only solution to the question? I mean. Everytimes if I see kind question like this, is that only way to do it?...

Many thx.

Squence

View attachment 20305

Continuous Functions.

View attachment 20306
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The short answer is that they don't know the details in advance. Using the first problem as an example, you see that for large n, the numerator is essentially n2, while the denominator is essentially n3, so the fraction is roughly 1/n. The rest is just filling in details to make it rigorous.
 
I still don't understand how to get it. :frown:
 
Do you understand that the example, as given, is not an example on how to find the limit but how to prove the limit is correct after you have found it? That is, for the purposes of the example, how the limit, 0, is found, is irrelevant.

The first sequence is
\left\{\frac{n^2+ 2n}{n^3- 5}\right\}
and, as mathman said, for very large n, the highest power in both numerator and denominator will be far larger than the rest so, for large n, the fraction will be close to n^2/n^3= 1/n which goes to 0 as n gets larger and larger.

So we guess that the limit of the given sequence is 0. Then we proceed to show, as in the example, that 0 is, in fact, correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Charles007 said:
I still don't understand how to get it. :frown:

There is no hard and fast rule. Limits are a way of rigorising the art of approximation. Your job is to simplify an expression enough so that you see the general behavior as it approaches some point, and then guess or approximate what happens at that point by comparing it to functions you already know. You can also use the rigor of making sure that there is some number bounding the expression.
This is partially why you studied the behavior of all those different types of functions in precalculus.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top