Space-Time Invariance, Weird Names and Some Questions

RadiantL
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I was going over my lectures notes and I was looking at the Invariance, S2 for space time.

I was just wondering why they call it time-like for S2<0 and space-like for S2>0 because,

S2>0 says that there is an inertial frame where events occur at the same time (this has to do with time, why call it space like?)

and

S2<0 says that there is an inertial frame where events occur at the same position
(this has to do with space, why call it time like?)

So yeah, why the weird naming?

Also I was wondering, according to my notes it says when events are time like they can be connected by a signal slower then light, and could be causal.

So can there be events where they can be connected by a signal and not be causal? ... And in S.R, when books say causal, they mean an event causes another right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Timelike and spacelike refer to the intervals or directions. If two events happen at the same time, then all the stuff between them is only space. If two events happen at the same position, then the only stuff between them is time.

Yes, causal means that an event causes another. Sometimes we expand the word a bit to say that one event could influence another (as opposed to that influence being impossible, as it is if two events are spacelike separated).

This should also help you understand timelike intervals. An object that follows a timelike trajectory or goes along an interval is basically going forward in time like you'd expect most things would, so any point in spacetime that object can reach by timelike trajectories is within its region of influence--a region that extends forward in time and through space. This region is called a light cone because in some diagrams, people put the x and y axes in a plane and the t axis perpendicular, and the region takes on a cone shape. Lightlike trajectories define the boundary of the cone, and everything between them is a possible path for most ordinary objects.
 
The proper term is "spacetime interval" which is an invariant (does not depend on the reference frame) for the interval between two events. If it is time-like, that means that you could measure the interval with an inertial clock present at the two events. If it is space-like, that means that you could measure the interval with an inertial ruler that is present at the two events. If it is light-like, that means you cannot measure the interval. The interval between any two events falls into one of those three types.
 
Thanks Murphid and ghwellsjr, really cleared things up :)
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top