Special relativity and flash bulbs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from Rindler regarding simultaneous flashes from bulbs located at lattice points in an inertial frame. The key point is the distinction between the bulbs flashing simultaneously in their own frame and how an observer at the origin perceives these flashes. Due to the finite speed of light, the observer will see the flashes at different times depending on their distance from the bulbs. This highlights the importance of accounting for light travel time when interpreting observations in relativity. Ultimately, while the bulbs flash simultaneously in their frame, the observer will not perceive them as such due to the effects of relativity.
matness
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


this is a problem from rindler

Suppose there are flush bulbs fixed at all lattice points of some inertial frame and suppose they all flash at once .what actually seen by an observer sitting at the origin?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i don' t understand the question itself ."they all flash at once": relative to whom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matness said:
"they all flash at once": relative to whom
Relative to the given inertial frame.
 
ok. But what changes then relative to the observer? The observer should see everything same. If it was so ,then i think rindler would not use this as a problem.there must be some poinnt that i missed
 
You are confusing (1) the bulbs flashing simultaneously, with (2) a person seeing (receiving the light from) the flashes simultaneously.

Example: You are at point x = 0. One bulb is at point x =0, another is at point x = 1 light year. If the two bulbs flash simultaneously (at the same time according to their synchronized clocks), when do you see the light from each bulb?
 
Last edited:
So i have to think two inertial frames: one of observer's and the other one synchronized stars'. And therefore only the bulbs which are at the same distance to the observer will flash simultaneously.and the further ones will flash later
Is it correct?
 
It's not a matter of multiple inertial frames--there is only one frame in this problem. Instead it's a matter of realizing that in order to interpret raw observations, one must account for light travel time.

Generally, in relativity thought experiments, one imagines an inertial frame as having zillions of observers (each with his own synchronized clock) located at every possible position. Thus when the lights flash, there will be a co-located observer able to confirm that the lights all flashed at the same time. (The various observers just compare their clock readings later.) But if an observer sees some event happen that is remote from him, he must subtract the light travel time from the time when he saw the light to find the actual time (according to clocks in his frame) that the event happened.

Of course, observers in a different frame (moving with respect to the bulbs) will disagree that the bulbs flashed simultaneously.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top