I Spherical Geometry Equilateral Pentagon

AI Thread Summary
In spherical geometry, an equilateral pentagon cannot have four right angles because the sum of the angles in a pentagon exceeds 540 degrees. Each angle in a spherical pentagon must be greater than 108 degrees to satisfy this condition. Therefore, having four angles at 90 degrees would result in a total of only 360 degrees, which is insufficient. This leads to the conclusion that it is impossible to construct such a pentagon under these geometric rules. The discussion clarifies the relationship between angle measures and the properties of spherical polygons.
GeometryIsHARD
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey PF! I'm going through a textbook right now and it just said "obviously, you can't have an equilateral pentagon with 4 right angles in spherical geometry (Lambert quadrilaterals).

However, I am not able to make the connection. can somebody help me understand why this is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So every angle must be greater than 108 degrees and therefore it's quite obvious you can't have four of them being 90 degree's. Is that what you are saying?
 
GeometryIsHARD said:
So every angle must be greater than 108 degrees and therefore it's quite obvious you can't have four of them being 90 degree's. Is that what you are saying?

Yes.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top