Spin angular momentum converted to orbital energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conversion of spin angular momentum to orbital energy in the context of a ball rolling on a roulette. The author seeks clarification on why spin momentum transitions to orbital momentum, particularly during the phases of slipping and rolling. It is highlighted that slipping involves surfaces sliding against each other, while rolling occurs when only part of the surface is in contact and moving. The validity of the physical model is questioned, specifically regarding its application once the ball is in motion and its connection to the roulette. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the mechanics involved in these motions.
borson
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello!
Excuse my ignorance. The forum is full of difficult questions so I even feel a bit ashamed of posting this, But that is the only way I can learn.
I do not understand some concepts stated below in the images, and I am not able to grasp what is being said. For instance, I do not know why spin momentum is turned into orbital momentum and so on...
b87h2b.png

33c2mtf.png

To be more specific, what does the author mean with:
"the first phase in which the ball slides/rolls and during which (with the help of sticky friction) slipping and abnormal spin angular momentum is converted to orbital energy; and then the second phase where slipping has ceased and the ball is performing a more or less regular rolling motion and where the points of contact between the ball and the rim of the wheel trace out a 3-dimensional roulette curve"As far as I know, "slipping" stands for a movement in which surfaces slide with each other, isn't it supposed to be happening the whole time during a spin of a roulette?
What is exactly saying the author? I'd be really grateful if someone could explain it to me with easier words

Moreover

"Our physical model described by equations (1) is only valid after the ball has connected to the roulette and before it disconnects from the roulette and leaves the track"

Does it mean that the model is valid once the ball is already in movement? what does it mean with "has connected to the roulette"?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
borson said:
As far as I know, "slipping" stands for a movement in which surfaces slide with each other, isn't it supposed to be happening the whole time during a spin of a roulette?
Do you understand the difference between slipping and rolling?
 
A.T. said:
Do you understand the difference between slipping and rolling?
I am not sure. in slipping friction all the surface of the body is sliding against anotherone, in rolling, just a part is sliding.
is it?. Again, excuse my ignorance
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top