I Spin Angular Momentum Dirac Equation

Bob Dylan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
In the Dirac equation, the wave-function is broken into four wave-functions in four entries in a column of a matrix. Since there are four separate versions of the wave-function, does each version have the spin angular momentum of h-bar/2? This seems overly simplistic. How does spin angular momentum work for the Dirac equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob Dylan said:
In the Dirac equation, the wave-function is broken into four wave-functions in four entries in a column of a matrix. Since there are four separate versions of the wave-function, does each version have the spin angular momentum of h-bar/2? This seems overly simplistic. How does spin angular momentum work for the Dirac equation?

The spin operator mixes the components of the Dirac wave function, so it's not a property of anyone component, but of all 4. On the other hand, orbital angular momentum does not mix the components, so it makes sense to say that a single component has an orbital angular momentum, but not to say that it has spin angular momentum.
 
Does this mean all four components share the same phase?
 
Bob Dylan said:
Does this mean all four components share the same phase?

If a particle is in a spin eigenstate, then the phases of the components must be related.

It's easiest to see with the two-component nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac equation, the Pauli equation.

With the Pauli equation, the wave function has two components: ##\psi = \left( \begin{array} \\ \alpha \\ \beta \end{array} \right)##.

If ##\psi## is spin-up in the z-direction, that means ##\left( \begin{array} \\ 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{array} \right)
\left( \begin{array} \\ \alpha \\ \beta \end{array} \right) = +1 \left( \begin{array} \\ \alpha \\ \beta \end{array} \right)##. That implies ##\beta = 0##.

If ##\psi## is spin-up in the x-direction, that means ##\left( \begin{array} \\ 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array} \right)
\left( \begin{array} \\ \alpha \\ \beta \end{array} \right) = +1 \left( \begin{array} \\ \alpha \\ \beta \end{array} \right)##. That implies ##\alpha = \beta##.
 
So is h-bar (or h-bar divided by 2) a form of spin or orbital angular momentum?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
982
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top