Square Root of 4: Can it be +2 or -2?

AI Thread Summary
The square root of 4 is conventionally defined as +2, despite -2 also being a valid solution since (-2)² equals 4. This convention ensures that the square root function is single-valued, leading to the definition that √a represents the positive root. Regarding the imaginary number i, squaring equations can introduce extraneous solutions, as shown in the example where squaring i² = -1 leads to an incorrect conclusion. The distinction between the principal square root and the general solutions is crucial for clarity in mathematical discussions. Understanding these conventions helps clarify common misconceptions in mathematics.
Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Consider square root of 4.

Can square root of 4 be +2 or -2?

I asked that to my math teacher so he said: NO, square root of 4 is +2!

But I can't really understand why it cannot be -2 since -2 squared is also 4. One thing I've imagined is: square root of 4 can be +2 or -2, but for CONVENTION we use +2. Is that right?

There's another question related to that: consider

i^2 = -1

squaring the two sides we obtain

i^4 = 1

so

i = 1

so: can the i (the imaginary number) be 1? I think I'm making a lot of confusion with that, could someone explain me that?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The square root of 4 can be +2 or -2, your math teacher is retarded. What you did with the imaginary number results in what I believe is called an extraneous solution (correct me if I'm wrong). If you substitute the 1 back into your original problem i^2=-1, you will find that 1=-1, which is not a true statement, meaning the solution is incorrect.
 
We get these types of questions a lot so it might be worthwhile to run a forum search on this topic to get a very thorough review of it. In fact, I might even say that this question has been discussed ad nauseum :wink:

However, for your first question the, square root of a number is often defined as the principal (or positive) root. This convention is not without reason though; if we would like to have a square root function, the square roots must necessarily be single-valued. Therefore, \sqrt{4} = 2. For a more complicated example, let x be a number such that x^2 = 4, then \sqrt{x^2} = |x| = 2 because \sqrt{x^2} is necessarily positive. Since |x| = 2, this means that x = 2 or x = -2.

For your second question, squaring equations has the unfortunate effect of adding extraneous solutions. Taking your example, clearly i^4 - 1 = 0 in which case (i^2 + 1)(i^2 - 1) = 0. By the zero product property, either i^2 + 1 = 0 or i^2 - 1 = 0 (note that only one of these need hold). From the conventional definition of i we have that i^2 + 1 = 0 and i^2 - 1 = 0 is just an extraneous solution added when we squared the equation.

Hopefully this all makes sense.
 
Thank you for the help guys. Now things make more sense.

PS: next time i'll do a forum search...
 
eg2333 said:
The square root of 4 can be +2 or -2, your math teacher is retarded. What you did with the imaginary number results in what I believe is called an extraneous solution (correct me if I'm wrong). If you substitute the 1 back into your original problem i^2=-1, you will find that 1=-1, which is not a true statement, meaning the solution is incorrect.

If his teacher is retarded, what does that make you? His teacher is completely right. The equation x^2= 4 has two roots. But only one of them is \sqrt{4} because \sqrt{a} is defined as "the positive root of the equation x^2= a".

The reason we have to write the solutions to that equation as "x= \pm\sqrt{a} is that \sqrt{a} alone does NOT mean both solutions. If it did we would not need the "\pm".
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top