Static electricity and method of seperating

AI Thread Summary
Conducting spheres fall off the roller due to the free movement of electrons, which allows them to neutralize the positive charge as they traverse the arc. In contrast, non-conducting spheres retain their charge at the surface, making it difficult for them to detach from the roller. The discussion highlights that while both types of spheres become negatively charged upon contact with the negatively charged roller, the behavior of charges differs significantly between conductors and non-conductors. Non-conductors do not allow mobile charges to flow easily, resulting in a stronger adherence to the roller. Understanding these differences is crucial for effective electrostatic separation methods.
winston
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The figure below shows an electrostatic method of separating conducting and non-conducting spheres

scan.jpg


Why do the conducting spheres fall off from the roller while the non-conducting spheres have to be scrapped off?



Thanks for the help.
Cheers,
Winston
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the significance of conducting?
 
Not too sure... Is the answer something about non-conductors holding the charge at the surface but charges in conductors flow throughout the material. But I thought that all the spheres will become negatively charged upon contact with the negatively charged roller.

HELP. THANKS
 
Is the answer something about non-conductors holding the charge at the surface but charges in conductors flow throughout the material.
Yes.

For the non-conducting material, the mobile charges (electrons) do not move so readily, so electrons will not flow onto the positively charged non-conducting material

In the 'conductor', the mobile charges (electrons) readily flow thus reducing the positive charge while the conducting material traverses the arc.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top