Static Electricity: Explaining the "Slide Shock

AI Thread Summary
The phenomenon of "slide shock" occurs due to static electricity generated by friction between clothing and the slide, leading to a separation of charges. As a result, the body accumulates excess electrons, causing hair to stand up due to repulsion between the similarly charged strands. This effect is more pronounced on dry days when humidity is low, as moisture in the air can dissipate static charges. The transfer of electrons can occur when touching the slide or another person, resulting in a small shock. Understanding this process explains why hair stands up and the sensation of static electricity is felt during such interactions.
Mariko
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Many times I have gone to the park, stuck my kid on the slide watched her slide down, hair sticking straight up, only to laugh at her and her to give me the "slide shock" as I give her a hand off the slide. Today however she asked me "why does the slide make my hair stick up", something in all honesty I have wondered myself, concidering that your head isn't the part you slide down on. I told her it must create a sort of electrical field.. I assume you all could explain this better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct. The friction of the clothing rubbing against the slide causes a separation of charges...resulting in your body having more electrons than it would if it were neutral. The electrons tend to stay on surfaces, especially sharp angles and pointy objects...thinking of a strand of hair as kind of pointy. Since each hair has extra electrons, the hairs repel each other, because the electrons repel each other. Anyway, the excess electron charges are quite free to move from the slide to the clothing and then onto the hair, or then from her finger to your hand when you touch at the bottom. You will notice that this happens most often on dry days, and less often when it is damp or raining out. But then I guess you might not be sliding on a day like that.

Richard
 
Thanks Richard
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top