Statics: Tension or Compression?

AI Thread Summary
To determine if a member is undergoing tension or compression, one can analyze the free body diagram (FBD) and apply calculations. Intuition and rough analysis may suffice in some cases, but accurate identification often requires detailed calculations. The sign of the calculated values indicates whether the member is in tension (positive) or compression (negative). Understanding the forces acting on the member is crucial for accurate assessment. Ultimately, the calculations clarify the state of the member without needing prior knowledge of its condition.
Elfrid Payton
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When examining a member, how do I tell whether it is undergoing tension or compression?

It's more of a general question, but since a visual might help with the explanation, this could be useful:

3Nr8op8.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elfrid Payton said:
When examining a member, how do I tell whether it is undergoing tension or compression?
You can calculate it.
Sometimes intuition and some rough analysis are sufficient, sometimes they are not.
 
mfb said:
You can calculate it.
Sometimes intuition and some rough analysis are sufficient, sometimes they are not.

The calculations are not the problem. Figuring out whether the members are undergoing tension or compression for the FBDs is what I'm having trouble with.
 
The calculations will give you negative or positive values. There is no need to know that in advance.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top