Stefan-Boltzman's radiation law problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter steveurkell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The integral of (x^3)/(exp(kx)-1) from 0 to infinity is significant in deriving Stefan-Boltzman's radiation law. A suggested method involves expressing the integrand as a product and using a geometric series expansion to simplify the fraction. After applying partial integration three times, the result is linked to the Riemann zeta function, specifically I = 6ζ(4). Alternative resources like mathematical tables can also provide the solution, confirming I = Γ(4)ζ(4). Understanding the proper limits of integration is crucial for solving this integral correctly.
steveurkell
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I cannot solve the following integral
integral from 0 to infinity of (x^3)/(exp(kx)-1) dx with k>0
as you may be able to guess, this integral is very famous one which can be used to deduce Stefan-Boltzman's radiation law
those of you who are experts may quickly recognize it and easily solve it
I've ever learned the trick 4 years ago, now forget hehe
so I would be grateful if you could teach me that trick
any comments are welcome

regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.
HINT:Write the integrand as a product between the
x^{3}
and the fraction containing the exponetial;then write the fraction as a sum of a geometic series with ratio e^{-kx}.
Take the sum in the exterior of the integral and then perform three times partial integration.U'll end up with:
I=6\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty} \frac{1}{k^{4}}

which is
I=6\zeta(4)

2.Search the integral in the tables (e.g.Abramowitz & Stegun,Gradsteyn & Rytzik ) to find
I=\Gamma(4)\zeta(4)

Daniel.
 
thank you
before my first posting, I had tried to use the geometrical series expansion, but I performed the summation inside the integral and I didn't realize that with limit of integration from 0 to infinity, I just could replace x by 0.

thanks anyway
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top