STRACT: Understanding the Complex Conjugate of a Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the complex conjugate of the function w(z) = e^{sin(z)}. The initial solution presented was w(z*) = e^{sin(z*)} and w(x - iy) = e^{sin(x - iy)}, which was confirmed as correct. A request for proof of this definition was made, emphasizing that the conjugate of a complex function w(z) = w(x + iy) is w(z*) = w(x - iy). The explanation provided referenced the relationship between e^{iθ} and its conjugate, illustrating how the product of a function and its conjugate results in unity, thereby supporting the definition of complex conjugation. Understanding these relationships helps clarify the concept of complex conjugates in functions.
leoneri
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a complex function

w\left(z\right)=e^{sin\left(z\right)}

What is the conjugate?

2. The attempt at a solution

The conjugate is

w\left(z^{*}\right)=e^{sin\left(z^{*}\right)}
w\left(x-iy\right)=e^{sin\left(x-iy\right)}

My question is, is my answer correct? If I wrong, could you tell me what is the right answer and how to reach this correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leoneri said:

Homework Statement



I have a complex function

w\left(z\right)=e^{sin\left(z\right)}

What is the conjugate?

2. The attempt at a solution

The conjugate is

w\left(z^{*}\right)=e^{sin\left(z^{*}\right)}
w\left(x-iy\right)=e^{sin\left(x-iy\right)}

My question is, is my answer correct? If I wrong, could you tell me what is the right answer and how to reach this correct answer?

Your answer is flawless!

AB
 
Thanks. I was sure about that, but one of my friend said I was wrong. So, is there a way to proof it? Because I see it as a definition that whenever there is a complex function w\left(z\right)=w\left(x+iy}\right), then the conjugate is always w\left(z^{*}\right)=w\left(x-iy\right). I would be more than happy if someone can show me or point me to a proof that the above definition is always true.
 
But I think you need
W*(z)
and not
W(z*)

Ask your advisor B. ...L.P. !
 
Last edited:
leoneri said:
Thanks. I was sure about that, but one of my friend said I was wrong. So, is there a way to proof it? Because I see it as a definition that whenever there is a complex function w\left(z\right)=w\left(x+iy}\right), then the conjugate is always w\left(z^{*}\right)=w\left(x-iy\right). I would be more than happy if someone can show me or point me to a proof that the above definition is always true.

Since that is a definition, we can't do so much to give a real proof. But you can imagine the case involving e^{i\theta}. In this case, using the Euler relation one can see

e^{i\theta}=\cos(\theta)+i\sin(\theta),
e^{i(-\theta)}=\cos(\theta)-i\sin(\theta) (by the symmetry of cos and anti-symmetry of sin wrt the change of the sign of \theta),

so

e^{i\theta}e^{i(-\theta)}=[\cos(\theta)+i\sin(\theta)][\cos(\theta)-i\sin(\theta)] = 1..

Here you can understand that the result of the product of the function e^{i\theta} and its complex conjugate leads to the correct answer 1 just by looking at the first part of the equality. The second part confirms the complex conjugation of e^{i\theta} and e^{-i\theta}. Thus a change in the sign of i makes the function be transferred into its complex conjugate phase.

AB
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top