B Strain on a foil sheet separating two compartments in a cylinder

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter TickTackBlock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Titanium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the structural integrity of a titanium foil placed between two halves of a cylinder under different pressure scenarios. In both scenarios, the strain on the foil is determined by the differential pressure, indicating that the strain will be the same regardless of whether one side is at a vacuum or atmospheric pressure. However, the presence of "nothing" on one side versus gas on both sides may introduce chemical and thermal effects that could influence the foil's integrity. Additionally, potential sympathetic failures from shock waves in the cylinder could affect the performance of secondary foils. Overall, while the basic strain calculations may remain consistent, other factors could impact the foil's ability to withstand pressure.
TickTackBlock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
A foil separating spaces with different pressure, vs possible difference of it separating a space with vacuum and a space with an atmosphere.
Hi. Lets say i have a cylinder, capped at both ends. It is cut in the middle and, say a titanium foil of 15 um thickness is pressed in between the 2 halves creating 2 spaces. It is pressed fairly hard, and a soft grip, "perfect" seal is created in someway but not right at the inside of the cylinder wall. There it is simply pressed loosely against both cylinder walls but without cutting the foil. Outside of the cylinder is normal earth conditions.

The cut edges of the cylinder wall on the inside are straight, the edges are graded but not at all gently rounded. The cylinder walls are also made out of titanium but are thick TLDR: a possible break (in possible followup question scenarios) would most likely happen on the foil where it meets the edges of the inside of the cylinder wall.

My inquire lies in the comparison of scenarios.

Scenario 1:
In one side of the cylinder there is an atmosphere with 1 bar of pressure, the end cap on that side has actually come of and it is open to the outside normal earth conditions, but lets say it is exactly 1 bar at this moment.

The other side of the cylinder has nitrogen gas inside it with a pressure of 2 bar.

Scenario 2:
In one side of the cylinder there is a near a vacuum with a continuous process connected to the space with an effort to create and keep this near vacuum. what amount of pressure it has, that will be compensated for on the other side of the foil.

And what do you know, now the end cap on the other side has come off and right now there is 1 bar (+ the same amount of pressure in the near vacuum) out side.


Questions:

Will the strain on the foil be the same in both scenarios? Is there a difference in being pushed towards a lower pressure atmosphere to being pushed towards nothing? if so, what and why.

Lets say i want to try if my foil holds between vacuum and 4 bar. Then could i really, for absolutely sure simply use 1 bar and 5 bar instead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

TickTackBlock said:
Will the strain on the foil be the same in both scenarios?
Yes. The strain is due simply to the differential pressure.

TickTackBlock said:
Lets say i want to try if my foil holds between vacuum and 4 bar. Then could i really, for absolutely sure simply use 1 bar and 5 bar instead?
Yes.

It seems like you are working with shock tubes, where the inert driver gas is initially separated from the reactant chamber by the foil rupture disc.

There is available literature on shock tubes using foil diaphragms to trigger the reaction. The foil thickness can be selected to burst at the required differential pressure.

There is a picture of a shock tube here.
Google Earth 51°34'47.22"N, 0°51'28.68"E
 
Hi, thank you.

However much i am now curious about shock tubes and their use - it is not what I am doing no.

Are we absolutely sure there is no difference in what the foil is experiencing here even if i were to accept that the formula for the force applied to it would be the same? There being "nothing" on one side in one instance, and something on both sides in the other instance, does it influence the foils ability to remain intact in some other way?
 
TickTackBlock said:
There being "nothing" on one side in one instance, and something on both sides in the other instance, does it influence the foils ability to remain intact in some other way?
There are chemical and thermal effects that may influence the structure of the foil. Those differ in their effect on the foil.

If there are other foil barriers, then there may be sympathetic failures, due to shock waves in the cylinder taking out secondary foils.

Without a better description of the experiment, or some idea of the failures you are anticipating, or experiencing, I cannot guess what might be happening.
 
There is indeed several other possible culprits. Sorry i can't say more.

Thanks again, feel safer about one worry now anyway.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top