B Strapped to a quadcopter in zero gravity

AI Thread Summary
In a zero-gravity environment, a quadcopter could theoretically be flown by a pilot strapped to it, relying on inertial forces and visual cues for navigation. The thrust vector of the quadcopter would always be normal to the propeller plane, allowing for control through yaw, throttle, pitch, and roll. However, without thrust, the quadcopter would simply float, making stability a significant challenge. Adjustable pitch propellers and potentially rewritten control software would be necessary to manage flight dynamics effectively. Overall, flying a quadcopter in such conditions could be feasible but would differ greatly from traditional flight in gravity.
bland
Messages
150
Reaction score
44
I was wondering... imagine a large enclosed space sealed off in intergalactic space, filled with air at normal sea level pressure. I was further wondering with regard to a quadcopter's symmetrical x and y-axis and the fact of the thrust vector always being normal to the plane of the props, that a person was securely strapped to this quadcopter and that it had a decent thrust to weight and was controlled by the pilot with a normal gimbal controller, with yaw and throttle and pitch and roll.

I was pondering that without any thrust it would just float around otherwise the person strapped to the body of the aircraft at the centre of gravity would feel the inertial force of acceleration and so would that pilot be able to fly around accurately merely by relying on the inertial forces they were feeling, assuming there were also plenty of visual cues in the 3 dimensional space in a gravity free zone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Will your quadcopter have adjustable pitch propellers? If so, over what range of adjustment angle? Why do I ask this? :wink:
 
I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to fly in such a situation. The control would be very different from flying in gravity though, and the software controlling it would probably need to be rewritten.
 
It would all be very unstable and the rotors would need to be reversible or the pilot would need a 4pi range for the gimbal mount.
Could it possibly be more stable than a vectored jet pack?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top