Stress Concentration around a circular hole on a flat rectangular plate

AI Thread Summary
Finding the analytical solution for stress concentration around a circular hole in a flat rectangular plate under tensile load involves using the stress concentration factor (Kt), which can range up to 3.0 based on the hole size. The Kt value is influenced by the hole diameter and its proximity to the plate edges, as detailed in Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors. For small hole diameters relative to the plate dimensions, simplifications can be made to the differential equations. The regular stress due to the tensile load is multiplied by Kt to determine the stress concentration. This classic mechanics problem is well-documented in standard mechanics of materials texts.
aidiot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help with how to find the analytical solution to problem involving finding the stress concentration around a circular hole in a flat plate.

The plate is has tensile load on both sides.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That's a classic example that is in any Mechanics of Materials text. Have you done any searching? The calculation, assuming plane stress, is the regular stress due to the tensile load multiplied by a stress concentration factor, Kt. That value ranges up to 3.0 depending on the size of the hole.

Chart 4.1 in Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors gives an empirical formula for the Kt value.
 
Last edited:
For a circular hole, I'd have imagined that Kt would be independent of the radius.
 
Kt is dependent on hole diameter and the distance between the hole edge and the plate edge.
 
Oh, I'm thinking of the limit where the hole diameter is small compared to the dimensions of the plate, and small compared to the distance from the nearest edge. If I was looking for an analytical solution to the DEs, I'd have started from that simplification.
 
thanks for your help guys...

much appreciated
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top