Substance decrease by factor of 100? (radioactivity)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for radioactive iodine (131-I) to decrease by a factor of 100, given its half-life of 8 days. The key equation used is N(t) = N(o)e^(-kt), where k is derived from the half-life. Participants clarify that the ratio N(t)/N(o) can be used to express the reduction, leading to the equation 1/100 = e^(-kt). After some calculations, the time required for the reduction is determined to be approximately 53.1 days. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying logarithmic functions in the calculations.
physics(L)10
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Radioactive iodine (131-I) has a half life of 8 days. How long does it take for iodine to be reduced by factor of 100?


Homework Equations


N(t)=N(o)e-kt
k=ln100/t1/2


The Attempt at a Solution



N(t)=N(o)e-kt

N(t)/N(o)=e-ln(100/8)t

Now I'm stuck. I would think to to take the ln of both sides, but there isn't any values given for N(t) or N(o). Also, the value of k I'm pretty sure is right...Any confirmation on this?

Thanks a lot for your help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics(L)10 said:
k=ln100/t1/2
Not true, you should look up this relation and use the correct one.

Now I'm stuck. I would think to to take the ln of both sides, but there isn't any values given for N(t) or N(o).
The phrase "to be reduced by factor of 100" suggests a relation between N(t) and N(o). It has nothing to do with the value of k.
 
physics(L)10 said:
Now I'm stuck. I would think to to take the ln of both sides, but there isn't any values given for N(t) or N(o).

No, but you know the ratio of N(t)/N0 right? "...reduced by factor of 100.." :wink:

Also, the value of k I'm pretty sure is right...Any confirmation on this?

Sorry, something is not quite right for your k value. You know the half life is 8 days. In other words,

N(8 days)/N0 = 1/2 = e-k(8 days). Solve for k.
 
Ok I think I got it:

N(o)/100 = N(o)e-kt

1/100 = e-kt

ln(1/100) = e-kt

ln(1/100) = -[(ln2)/8](t)

53.1 days = t
 
physics(L)10 said:
Ok I think I got it:

N(o)/100 = N(o)e-kt

1/100 = e-kt

ln(1/100) = e-kt

ln(1/100) = -[(ln2)/8](t)

53.1 days = t

I think you forgot to express taking the natural log of the right side of the equation above in red (but it seems that you did later in the next step). (Any time you do something to one side of an equation, you must do the same thing to the other side, at the same time.) Anyway, your final answer is about the same as what I got (slightly different at the 4th significant digit). :smile:
 
Yes, I just forgot to put it in. Thanks for your help :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top