Sum over histories and double slit?

beatlemaniacj
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I was recently studying Feynman's sum-over-histories approach to quantum probability. I also was reading an interesting paper on the double slit experiment. How do these two work together. Do some of the probability waves not have a out of phase partner to interfere with itself?

On a related not, what's the difference between the proxy wave, and Feynman's probability waves.

If the proxy wave is fictitious, how do atoms resist other atoms passing through it.

I know this is a lengthy question but please try to answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way to do the "sum over histories" for the 2 slit experiment, is to take the classical paths (2 of them) and just simply add up e^iS/h for the 2 different paths to get an amplitude. The probability is of course the absolute square of the amplitude. There is of course a normalizing factor, but that can be sometimes annoying to get, and I can't remember the details of that for the 2-slit experiment at this moment.
 
And that value (absolute square of the amplitude) would be the probability of the electron going through both slits?
 
No, the probability that the electron arrives at that spot in the detector. There is no probability for the electron "going through both slits".
 
This still applies in the case of an interference pattern when only one electron is fired.
 
Yes it does. You sum over both paths, but that doesn't mean the electron physically moves through both slits.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top