Supernovae of Procyon & Capella Systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter izzywizzy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supernovae Systems
AI Thread Summary
Procyon and Capella systems cannot produce Type Ia supernovae because they are not binary systems capable of generating such explosions. Procyon consists of a main sequence star, Procyon A, and a white dwarf companion, Procyon B, with an average separation of 15 AU. The distance between the stars is too great for Procyon A to transfer mass to Procyon B effectively, preventing a potential supernova event. Procyon A will eventually become a red giant, but its mass is insufficient to trigger an explosion in Procyon B, which is only 0.6 solar masses. Therefore, these systems will not experience a Type Ia supernova in the foreseeable future.
izzywizzy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
would star systems such as Procyon or Capella blow up as 1a supernovae?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Only binary systems can generate Ia supernova.
 
the reason i asked is because it says on wikipedia:

"What appears as a single star to the naked eye is actually a binary star system, consisting of a white main sequence star of spectral type F5 IV-V, named Procyon A, and a faint white dwarf companion of spectral type DA, named Procyon B. The reason for its brightness is not its intrinsic luminosity but its closeness to the Sun; at a distance of 3.5 pc or 11.41 light years..."

"The average separation of the two suns is 15 AUs, a little less than the distance between Uranus and the Sun, though the eccentric orbit carries them as close as 9 AUs and as far as 21"


so I'm wondering if procyon A will cause procyon B to explode when it turns into a red giant in 10-100 million years
-procyon B(white dwarf) is only .6 solar masses

here's A and B's orbit path http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Procyonorbitillustration.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Much too far apart to generate an SnIa event in the foreseeable future, IMO.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
996
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top