Supersymmetry - current status

jirka.win
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I wanted to ask wheter there is any progress when it comes to SUSY.
Since LHC didn't find any superpartners and LUX found no neutralinos how much space does SUSY have left? I mean it can be fine tuned but that can't be done forever right?

Or is there something I don't know that improves SUSYs chances?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wanted to ask wheter there is any progress when it comes to SUSY.
Just more exclusions and better limits.

SUSY as a whole cannot be excluded by the LHC - but if the LHC does not find anything, the theoretical arguments for it get significantly weaker. Even now, some of the easiest models get problematic.
 
mfb said:
Just more exclusions and better limits.

SUSY as a whole cannot be excluded by the LHC - but if the LHC does not find anything, the theoretical arguments for it get significantly weaker. Even now, some of the easiest models get problematic.

Yeah I read several papers and I'm getting a little worried.
Not because I have some sort of emotional connection to that model but because if nothing is found funding for particle physics will probably get cut.

I just want to ask. If SUSY particles don't show up, at what point will theoretical physicist consider the model dead? Since some supersymmetric models can be pushed really far (only Kardashev civilization II would be able to rule them out).
 
jirka.win said:
Yeah I read several papers and I'm getting a little worried.
Not because I have some sort of emotional connection to that model but because if nothing is found funding for particle physics will probably get cut.
That's certainly an issue. I guess the ILC does not need SUSY particles to get funded as it will be the first lepton collider to study Higgs and Top, but anything beyond that does not have a good physics motivation so far.
The planned Chinese Higgs factory (circular e+e- collider) could be interesting as well, as Chinese funding methods look a bit different.

I just want to ask. If SUSY particles don't show up, at what point will theoretical physicist consider the model dead?
My guess: Never.
Since some supersymmetric models can be pushed really far (only Kardashev civilization II would be able to rule them out).
I'm sure you can push the scale even beyond the GUT scale in some way... :D.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
Back
Top