Supremum of f(x) on [a,b] vs. supremum of f(x+c) on [a+c, b+c]

  • MHB
  • Thread starter OhMyMarkov
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Supremum
In summary: In post#4, I suggest you try proving equality of two sets. Why those sets are the same is quite straight-forward.
  • #1
OhMyMarkov
83
0
Hello everyone!

I'm really stuck on this one, it looks so obvious, but I can't prove it:

Let $\alpha = \sup _{x\in [a,b]} f(x)$, how can I show that $\alpha = \sup _{x\in [a+c,b+c]} f(x+c)$?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello everyone!

I'm really stuck on this one, it looks so obvious, but I can't prove it:

Let $\alpha = \sup _{x\in [a,b]} f(x)$, how can I show that $\alpha = \sup _{x\in [a+c,b+c]} f(x+c)$?

Thanks!
Don't think that's true. Put $a=0,b=1,c=1,f(x)=x$.

I think you mistyped the question. It should be $\sup_{x\in[a,b]}f(x)=\sup_{x\in[a+c,b+c]}f(x-c)$
 
  • #3
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

Yes that was a typo... Any answers?
 
  • #4
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

OhMyMarkov said:
Yes that was a typo... Any answers?
Try proving $\{f(x):x\in [a,b]\}=\{f(x-c):x\in [a+c,b+c]\}$
 
  • #5
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

Yes that was a typo, any suggestions?
 
  • #6
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

OhMyMarkov said:
Yes that was a typo, any suggestions?
In post#4 I suggest you try proving equality of two sets. Why those sets are the same is quite straight-forward.

Write $A=\{f(x):x\in[a,b]\}$ and $B=\{f(x-c):x\in[a+c,b+c]\}$. Let $y\in A$.
Then $\exists r\in[a,b]$ such that $f(r)=y\Rightarrow f((r+c)-c)=y$.
But $r+c$ is in $[a+c,b+c]$. This proves $y\in B$.

We conclude $A\subseteq B$. Show the reverse inclusion too. Then it easily follows that $\sup A=\sup B$ simple because $A$ and $B$ are the same. Of course this assumes that the supremum exists.
 
  • #7
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

Hello caffeinemachine, thanks for replying (twice)

I may have sounded rude repeating "any suggestions?" twice, but that was due to an internet problem. I did exactly what you suggested the 1st time :)
 
  • #8
Re: Supremum of $f(x)$ on $[a,b]$ vs. supremum of $f(x+c)$ on $[a+c,b+c]$

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello caffeinemachine, thanks for replying (twice)

I may have sounded rude repeating "any suggestions?" twice, but that was due to an internet problem. I did exactly what you suggested the 1st time :)
(Yes)
 

FAQ: Supremum of f(x) on [a,b] vs. supremum of f(x+c) on [a+c, b+c]

What is the difference between supremum of f(x) on [a,b] and supremum of f(x+c) on [a+c, b+c]?

The supremum of a function on a given interval is the smallest upper bound of the function values within that interval. When we add a constant c to the function, the supremum on the new interval [a+c, b+c] will also be shifted by c units. In other words, the supremum on [a+c, b+c] will be the supremum on [a,b] plus c.

How does the supremum of a function change when we add a constant to the function?

Adding a constant c to a function will shift the function vertically by c units. Therefore, the supremum on the new interval will also be shifted by c units.

Is the supremum of f(x+c) on [a+c, b+c] always equal to the supremum of f(x) on [a,b] plus c?

Yes, the supremum on [a+c, b+c] will always be equal to the supremum on [a,b] plus c when we add a constant c to the function. This is because the addition of a constant only shifts the function vertically and does not change the shape of the graph or the values of the function.

Can the supremum of a function on an interval change when we add a constant to the function?

No, the supremum of a function on an interval will not change when we add a constant to the function. This is because the supremum is determined by the upper bound of the function values on the interval, and adding a constant only shifts the function vertically without changing its shape or values.

How do we determine the supremum of a function on a given interval?

To determine the supremum of a function on a given interval, we need to find the largest value that the function takes on within that interval. This can be done by finding the critical points of the function (where the derivative is equal to 0) and evaluating the function at these points, as well as the endpoints of the interval. The largest of these values will be the supremum of the function on that interval.

Similar threads

Back
Top